Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Unknown Pundit

I completely understand your numerical assessment. I just totally disagree that the reaction will be what you and he think it is going to be. First, I think most gamblers are likely to simply work around it or ignore it. After all, this stuff has to be enforced. I doubt banks will immediately do that, because they don't know which sites are 'illegal' without some tipoff. Second, I doubt it will be enforceable, either, as the gamblers will simply transfer funds to international banks that WILL transfer to the gambling sites. So I don't think players will care, because the sites will continue as usual.

But that said--I doubt a substantial percentage of players vote to begin with, and those that will vote won't do so primarily on the basis of this ban. Frist gambled that was the case, and I think it was a good bet (pun intended).


72 posted on 10/22/2006 7:08:05 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When personal character isn't relevant to voters or party leaders, Foley happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile

You may be right. It just seems to me there was little to gain politically from this, and perhaps more to lose. Too late now anyway, the cow is out of the barn... LOL. Adios.


76 posted on 10/22/2006 8:11:12 PM PDT by Unknown Pundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile
Frist gambled that was the case, and I think it was a good bet (pun intended).

A good bet? Why? How is this supposed to help anyone? Are you really a libertarian?
79 posted on 10/23/2006 10:40:40 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson