Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The G.O.P.’s Bad Bet
N Y Times ^ | 10/19/2006 | CHARLES MURRAY

Posted on 10/19/2006 11:53:10 AM PDT by Sabramerican

LAST week President Bush signed a law that will try to impede online gambling by prohibiting American banks from transferring money to gambling sites. Most Americans probably didn’t notice or care, but it may do significant political damage to the Republicans this fall and long-term damage to Americans’ respect for the law.

So, a month before a major election, the Republicans have allied themselves with a scattering of voters who are upset by online gambling and have outraged the millions who love it. Furthermore, judging from many hours of online chat with Internet poker players, I am willing to bet (if you’ll pardon the expression) that the outraged millions are disproportionately electricians, insurance agents, police officers, mid-level managers, truck drivers, small-business owners — that is, disproportionately Republicans and Reagan Democrats.

In the short term, this law all by itself could add a few more Democratic Congressional seats in the fall elections. We are talking about a lot of people (an estimated 23 million Americans gamble online) who are angry enough to vote on the basis of this one issue, and they blame Republicans.

...... If a free society is to work, the vast majority of citizens must reflexively obey the law not because they fear punishment, but because they accept that the rule of law makes society possible. That reflexive law-abidingness is reinforced when the laws are limited to core objectives that enjoy consensus support, .....

The reaction to Prohibition, the 20th century’s stupidest law, is the archetypal case. But the radical expansion of government throughout the last century has created many more.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1dncmoutpiece; biggovernment; democratpropaganda; dumblaws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: djl_sa
But that being said, the net affect of this law is that I have moved to a different online poker site that will not block US players and I will continue to play. We shall see how it will impact my ability to deposit/withdraw fund from my account.

Yup - everyone moved to PokerStars! A few weeks ago, they had about 20,000-25,000 players at any given time. Last night, they were up to 92,000 - they'll be hitting 100,000 soon. This is the test case and I hope they win. If PokerStars loses, that's basically the end of online poker in the USA until this worthless law gets repealed... and it's much harder to repeal a bad law then it is to get one passed.
41 posted on 10/19/2006 2:34:30 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
....people should keep in mind, that a lot of "off shore" gambling is done with people who are not friendly with the US...THEY WANT YOUR MONEY, but will never let you know where it's going, or who it's going to.......

So the US should allow companies to conduct online gambling here. It's not like using a foreign country is a first choice - it's the only choice.
42 posted on 10/19/2006 2:36:18 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
then again...it's a times story...you know rile the troops, get em pi$$ed so they'll stay home Nov 7th...
43 posted on 10/19/2006 2:57:39 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF 69-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Couldnt agree with you more this bill pissed me off big time. Everyone I work with plays and they all vote GOP even donate the max. Makes me not want to vote but will just cause cant stand the left.


44 posted on 10/19/2006 3:10:47 PM PDT by richardthelionheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

On about 99 percent of things this guy writes about would agree. Have a bricknmortar casino 5 minutes from my house. See a lot of Bush/Cheney stickers in parking lot also i play online and have a ton of family/friends who do too they all vote GOP. This pissed me off why do this, I have no answer. Playing online poker bothered no one. Millions play and watch it on tv. Still going to be a republican but am really pissed. Dont know many liberals but i do no alot of people gamble.


45 posted on 10/19/2006 3:14:49 PM PDT by richardthelionheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Actually I moved over to FullTilt... but I don't know how to tell how many are on at any time.


46 posted on 10/19/2006 4:12:20 PM PDT by djl_sa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: djl_sa

Really - FullTilt is going too? That's good to know. I was playing Party Poker for years - just getting used to PokerStars. Some of the interface is better, some are worse. How do you like FullTilt? Do they have pot-limit/no-limit Omaha-8 there?


47 posted on 10/19/2006 4:16:32 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I suspect it had far more to do with the govts inability to tax online gambling sonce the entities running the online gambling operations were offshore. It's a certainty the govt doesn't care if individuals gamble since they sanction it by sponsoring the lottery for the specific purpose of collecting revenue from those poor souls who want to spend their income in the astronomically remote hope of getting rich.


48 posted on 10/19/2006 4:32:06 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

49 posted on 10/19/2006 4:37:31 PM PDT by AmishDude (Mwahahahahahahahaha -- official evil laugh of the North American Union)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Um, I think his point was that those folks who do play poker on-line do care and they number in the millions. You are aware that voters will respond when their ox is gored, aren't you?

For example, say there are 20 million on-line gamblers, and that 40% are not affiliated with either party. That computes to 8 million people. These 8 million understand it was a Republican senator that made this happen. Many of them will be less likely to vote for a Republican candidate now. That could make the difference in many tight races. Now do you understand?

50 posted on 10/19/2006 4:54:35 PM PDT by Unknown Pundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: balch3
Moral absolutes are not negotiable.

How's the weather up there on that ivory tower? You folks getting enough oxygen up there?

But seriously, moral absolutes may not be negotiable, but they aren't the proper purview of the state either. The role of religion is to lead folks to the light, not beat them onto the path using the government as the stick.

51 posted on 10/19/2006 5:07:01 PM PDT by Unknown Pundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

Tell me more about him then?


52 posted on 10/19/2006 5:26:57 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
Republicans have allied themselves with a scattering of voters who are upset by online gambling and have outraged the millions who love it

This author is literally psychotic. Who knows or cares about this issue? This is the first I've heard of it, and I care not. And personally, I HATE gambling. I'd rather take my money and burn it, since at least if I burned it it would provide me some value (warmth) as opposed to gambling it away.

53 posted on 10/19/2006 5:33:25 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardthelionheart

I noticed from your posting history that you have been away from FR for two years and now you are joining this thread. At least you are going to vote Republican, please tell you family and friends to do the same.


54 posted on 10/19/2006 5:37:46 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Tell me more about him then?

See here. He's most famous for writing The Bell Curve, which enraged liberals.

55 posted on 10/19/2006 6:26:23 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
Who knows or cares about this issue?

Lots of people.

And personally, I HATE gambling.

That's nice. Millions of Americans enjoy it, and the large majority do so responsibly. Particularly in the case of poker, where skill is more important than luck.

56 posted on 10/19/2006 6:30:36 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

And here I thought this would be about good ol' Linc. Bummer.


57 posted on 10/19/2006 6:30:46 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
Moral absolutes are not negotiable

This isn't abortion or homosexual marriage.

If someone wants to urinate his money away on Internet poker, what business is it of the government or religious busybodies?

58 posted on 10/19/2006 6:33:33 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

How many people are going to base their vote on a single issue of online gambling? Not many. Pipe dreams for a RAT.


59 posted on 10/19/2006 6:35:19 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
OK thanks. Is he a bitter Buchananite style conservative?
60 posted on 10/19/2006 6:41:21 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson