Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

It seems like the Taurus started out as an excellent, almost revolutionary design, but in 21 years the world changed and the Taurus didn't. Pair that with the 3.8l engine debacle and the positioning of the 24v engine as an option rather than a standard (necessity) and you're left with a car that defined the state of the art and became a great bland nothingness which the state of the art has long since passed on by.


18 posted on 10/19/2006 11:07:29 AM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

It is bland by modern standards. About as bland as everything else on the road these days. But what I like about them is that I can fit in it.

I'm 6'3", and if I wanted to buy any other car I could fit into, it would cost me about twice as much or more.


57 posted on 10/19/2006 11:27:31 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

I used to call it the clitaurus becasue it had no balls.


205 posted on 10/19/2006 5:06:37 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson