Posted on 10/18/2006 4:52:08 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
The US has adopted a tough new policy aimed at protecting its interests in space and denying "adversaries" access there for hostile purposes. The document - signed by President Bush - also says "freedom of action in space is as important to the United States as air power and sea power".
The document rejects any proposals to ban space weapons. But the White House has said the policy does not call for the development or deployment of weapons in space.
However, some military experts warn that by refusing to enter into negotiations on space weaponry, the US is likely to fuel international suspicions that it will develop such weapons. The 10-page strategic document states that the US national security "is critically dependent upon space capabilities, and this dependence will grow".
"The United States will preserve its rights, capabilities, and freedom of action in space... and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to US national interests," it says.
Satellite fears The document also sets out US commercial ambitions, saying it is committed to encouraging and facilitating a growing entrepreneurial space sector.
It is the first revision in US space policy for 10 years, and it is a forthright one, the BBC's Nick Miles in Washington says. It addresses concerns voiced in a 2001 Pentagon report that said technological advances would enable potential enemies to disrupt orbiting US satellites, our correspondent says. Unclassified details of the policy published on the internet say space capabilities, including spy and other communication satellites, are essential for national security.
But the White House said the policy was not a prelude to putting weapons in orbit and that there was no shift in US policy. "The notion that you would do defence from space is different from that of weaponisation of space. We're comfortable with the policy", White House spokesman Tony Snow said. President Bush authorised the policy in August but it was not released until October. During the Cold War, President Ronald Reagan proposed a defence shield using laser or particle beam technology to "intercept and destroy" incoming nuclear missiles.
|
ACLU and the DemonicRats are gonna complain....also jimmae Carter....and maybe John Kerry.
Rumor that the Chinese are working on an EMP weapon/....
"Today, the universe; Tomorrow, our the borders"
In other news, a Guest Astronaut program was announced, for those liftoffs Americans just won't do...
Every nuclear power already has one. High-altitude nuclear weapons can devastate the electronics of a wide area. More info...
Maybe we can tell the Enviro's and the ACLU that we found living organisms in space that need their rights and environment protected. They could pay Russia and China to launch them into orbit.....
Gad...I just love that kind of talk.
The US has adopted a tough new policy aimed at protecting its interests in space and denying "adversaries" access there for hostile purposes.
That's the best news I have heard lately.
(Heinlein was right. I don't want to have to learn Chinese or Russian to go to space!)
....did he bother to ask the grays how they feel about this?
RE: "However, some military experts warn that by refusing to enter into negotiations on space weaponry, the US is likely to fuel international suspicions that it will develop such weapons."
What a load. The people most likely to attack us in space (or to attack our hardware) and most likely to attack us FROM space, are probably already cheating on the earlier naive space non militarization pie crust treaty. We are ALWAYS the rubes who follow the rules and get burned. For once, I'd like to see us get out ahead of the game in terms of military chess moves. No more reactive Mr. Nice Guy!
Surely the Chicoms plan on doing what they can to reach parity with the US in the decades to come. The cold war shall continue for a long long time.
George W. Bush's "admission" and the Tet analogy ~~ ARE THE TERRORISTS TRYING TO PULL A TET IN IRAQ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.