Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US adopts tough new space policy
BBC ^ | Wednesday, 18 October 2006, 19:14 GMT 20:14 UK | BBC Staff

Posted on 10/18/2006 4:52:08 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

US adopts tough new space policy

US space shuttle Atlantis. File photo

The document outlines US military and commercial ambitions in space

The US has adopted a tough new policy aimed at protecting its interests in space and denying "adversaries" access there for hostile purposes.

The document - signed by President Bush - also says "freedom of action in space is as important to the United States as air power and sea power".

The document rejects any proposals to ban space weapons.

But the White House has said the policy does not call for the development or deployment of weapons in space.

The United States will preserve its rights, capabilities, and freedom of action in space... and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to US national interests

Most computers will open PDF documents automatically, but you may need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.

However, some military experts warn that by refusing to enter into negotiations on space weaponry, the US is likely to fuel international suspicions that it will develop such weapons.

The 10-page strategic document states that the US national security "is critically dependent upon space capabilities, and this dependence will grow".

"The United States will preserve its rights, capabilities, and freedom of action in space... and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to US national interests," it says.

Satellite fears

The document also sets out US commercial ambitions, saying it is committed to encouraging and facilitating a growing entrepreneurial space sector.

President Bush. File photo

The Bush administration says there is no shift in its policy

It is the first revision in US space policy for 10 years, and it is a forthright one, the BBC's Nick Miles in Washington says.

It addresses concerns voiced in a 2001 Pentagon report that said technological advances would enable potential enemies to disrupt orbiting US satellites, our correspondent says.

Unclassified details of the policy published on the internet say space capabilities, including spy and other communication satellites, are essential for national security.

But the White House said the policy was not a prelude to putting weapons in orbit and that there was no shift in US policy.

"The notion that you would do defence from space is different from that of weaponisation of space. We're comfortable with the policy", White House spokesman Tony Snow said.

President Bush authorised the policy in August but it was not released until October.

During the Cold War, President Ronald Reagan proposed a defence shield using laser or particle beam technology to "intercept and destroy" incoming nuclear missiles.



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: spacedefense

1 posted on 10/18/2006 4:52:09 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; Marine_Uncle; onyx; Dog; Coop; Cap Huff; SunkenCiv; ...

ACLU and the DemonicRats are gonna complain....also jimmae Carter....and maybe John Kerry.


2 posted on 10/18/2006 4:54:50 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Rumor that the Chinese are working on an EMP weapon/....


3 posted on 10/18/2006 4:55:56 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Aeronaut

"Today, the universe; Tomorrow, our the borders"

In other news, a Guest Astronaut program was announced, for those liftoffs Americans just won't do...


4 posted on 10/18/2006 4:57:14 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
the
5 posted on 10/18/2006 4:57:58 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Rumor that the Chinese are working on an EMP weapon...

Every nuclear power already has one. High-altitude nuclear weapons can devastate the electronics of a wide area. More info...

6 posted on 10/18/2006 4:59:43 PM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Maybe we can tell the Enviro's and the ACLU that we found living organisms in space that need their rights and environment protected. They could pay Russia and China to launch them into orbit.....


7 posted on 10/18/2006 4:59:52 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The United States will preserve its rights, capabilities, and freedom of action in space... and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to US national interests

Gad...I just love that kind of talk.

8 posted on 10/18/2006 5:01:59 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
US adopts tough new space policy

The US has adopted a tough new policy aimed at protecting its interests in space and denying "adversaries" access there for hostile purposes.

That's the best news I have heard lately.

(Heinlein was right. I don't want to have to learn Chinese or Russian to go to space!)

9 posted on 10/18/2006 5:12:27 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

....did he bother to ask the grays how they feel about this?


10 posted on 10/18/2006 5:32:07 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

RE: "However, some military experts warn that by refusing to enter into negotiations on space weaponry, the US is likely to fuel international suspicions that it will develop such weapons."

What a load. The people most likely to attack us in space (or to attack our hardware) and most likely to attack us FROM space, are probably already cheating on the earlier naive space non militarization pie crust treaty. We are ALWAYS the rubes who follow the rules and get burned. For once, I'd like to see us get out ahead of the game in terms of military chess moves. No more reactive Mr. Nice Guy!


11 posted on 10/18/2006 6:16:39 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Surely the Chicoms plan on doing what they can to reach parity with the US in the decades to come. The cold war shall continue for a long long time.


12 posted on 10/18/2006 8:21:09 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle; GOP_1900AD; Coyoteman
Meanwhile we have this:

George W. Bush's "admission" and the Tet analogy ~~ ARE THE TERRORISTS TRYING TO PULL A TET IN IRAQ?

13 posted on 10/18/2006 11:22:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks Ernie. It is a shame there are not able minded conservatives that could set the record straight yet again concerning Iraq verse Nam, during the few chances some get to be interviewed by the alphabet political shows on say Sunday mornings.
But alas. One can talk to their blue in the face and a perhaps majority of Americans would stay stuck on stupid. Wars bring emotions/fears out in people that are hard to cancel out with logic and accurate reporting.
And obviously the L/MSM understand this principal in full.
14 posted on 10/19/2006 7:32:58 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson