[Dimensio]

If you had no response to the fact that you lied in the past, I do not understand why you expended the energy to post in this discussion at all. I merely wished to make you aware that I was referencing your previous lies, as a courtesy to you. Insulting me is not an appropriate response to this.

[RunningWolf]

Vade, this demented character on your side (who wont even post to me directly) has a pretty obscure and bizarre notion of what lie and lying is, especially as to the subject of toe.

It seems in her world she simply declares a statement false and then if one repeats it after that now they are a liar because she has already ‘shown them the truth’ I think I got that right but it is such a tight circular distorted logic that she operates hidden behind a screen of inference and demands that it is hard to pin her down on it. And when she does see that she is being caught out she will simply abandon the thread to repeat her attacks on a new target.

The gal lives in a dream world if she believes that 'people have been shown other wise' on most everything she asserts, which is very little when you get down to it.

Also for some reason it seems his obsession to make everyone 'a liar' that she senses does not buy into her beliefs.

Now if we go back to that thread where ever it is, as far as I can recall I was ready to deliver the evidence as long as I got the evos to put themselves out there with statements they could be held accountable to, and that is when all the hedging, back pedaling, and discounting of whole the PiltDown Man thesis issue began.

If nothing else the demented tag team of evo weasels are very adept at making relentless demands, twisting and distorting the argument and/or the other persons words, and being very difficult to pin them down in a direct manner.

When Pilt Down Man hit the world of evolutionary theory, it rocked their world, it was hailed as the missing link of Ape to Man, and the biggest names of TOE in England Europe and the USA bought into to it. It was in the Encyclopedia Britannica up to the year 1953, all the text books had to be re written after it was finally debunked.

If this character is going to call me a liar on this though, I would at least like to see evidence from her as why no doctoral thesis at all would have been written on such a earth shattering (at the time) find.

W.