Replies

Most amateur evolutionists tend to defer in their opinions to those who have actually studied the matter more intensely than they have.

Creationists, amateur and otherwise, on the other hand, seem to have no reluctance to tell even the most experienced scientists that they know nothing about anything when it comes to evolution.

Creationists, amateur and otherwise, on the other hand, seem to have no reluctance to tell even the most experienced scientists...

I can't speak for others, creationists or otherwise. The point that I have been trying to make on these threads is that you can't make a determination regarding species differentiation based on homology. DNA comparison between living animals has show that homology is not a reliable method for determining a common ancestor.

Evolutionists, amateur or otherwise, seem to have no reluctance to ignore the evidence that is counter to commonly held evolutionist beliefs. All of the evidence supports the truth. None can be ignored, and all interpretations of the evidence must be recognized for exactly what they are, or we have abandoned science and adopted ideology. Consensus to a theory or belief is not additional evidence for said belief.