Who cares who's posting? The claim that Piltdown was not criticised is simply false. It doesn't matter whether anyone is around at any given moment to say it. The sun also rises.
Mainly because the hoaxer engineered a second find, Piltdown II. The problem was that the critics, although correctly claiming that Piltdown I represented not a single species but two -- the jaw from an ape and the skull from a human -- had not seriously considered the possibility of deliberate fraud. Therefore they were effectively arguing that it was a fortuitous association of ape and human materials, misinterpreted as a single creature. Therefore when a separate, second such association was produced, the chance association argument became untenable. (Even though, as the Talk Origins page points out, several important critics persisted.)
Um, No. What you said was:
the biggest names of TOE in England Europe and the USA bought into to it
When in fact (until Piltdown II at least) only a rather small MINORITY of leading evolutionists "bought into it," and its critics included a number of the world's leading anthropologists. (Several of the British scientists supporting it weren't actually experts in human anatomy.)