Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP sources: Newt moves to become the Republicans' savior in ‘08
Insight n the News ^ | 10/17/2006

Posted on 10/18/2006 10:25:32 AM PDT by rob777

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has quietly positioned himself for a comeback to head the Republican Party as early as 2008.

GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich does not plan to run for president, but intends to be available as the savior of conservatives dismayed by candidates who seek to move the party to the left in the aftermath of George W. Bush’s presidency. Over the last few months, Mr. Gingrich has become the favorite of conservatives and has outlined a new vision for the GOP that seeks for the party to return to the moral clarity of the late President Ronald Reagan.

“I believe that whatever the results of the November elections, Newt will become a major force in the GOP for 2008," a senior Republican Party strategist said.

Mr. Gingrich has already become the choice of conservatives and the Christian Right. He has won the Human Events presidential straw poll for September, topping the list for the second month in a row.

The achievement marked a major boost for Mr. Gingrich. For much of 2006, Mr. Gingrich trailed Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, in the poll, but last month Mr. Gingrich led the House member by 31 to 17 percent.

Among conservatives, Mr. Gingrich is more popular than senior allies of President Bush and members of his administration. In the Human Events poll, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dropped to sixth place with 6.68 percent. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the president's younger brother, reached 3.37 percent in the presidential straw poll.

GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich decided to raise his profile in 2006, with the publication of a weekly newsletter and the gathering of a brain trust. Over the last few months, he has been campaigning for Republican candidates and commenting on both domestic and foreign issues.

On several issues, Mr. Gingrich has taken positions that differ with that of the administration. While Mr. Bush has urged diplomacy to deal with a nuclear North Korea, Mr. Gingrich has been calling for regime change that echoed the Reagan era and the president's efforts with then-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the late Pope John Paul II to undermine the communist regimes in Eastern Europe.

"When you look at a country such as North Korea, you see tremendous poverty," Mr. Gingrich said in a radio interview last week. "You have to believe that there are thousands of people who might want to collaborate with the West. We're remarkably bureaucratic. Rather than work with the North Korean government, we ought to be cooperating with those willing to smuggle food into the country. We have to recognize what a bad dictatorship this is."

GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich will most likely not run for president in 2008. But they said he would seek to represent the conservative wing of the party, the endorsement of which would be regarded as crucial for any GOP nominee.

"It's obvious that in 2008, the party will move away from the Bush era and will be looking for a change in direction," another GOP source said. "I think Newt will be in a position to lay out a strategy that would appeal to both conservatives and old-line Republicans."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newt; newtgingrich; ohyes; uhhhhhhhidontthinkso
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: wagglebee

I was attempting to draft a post along those lines and couldn't get my thoughts into the right words. I read on... and found you had said it perfectly!


121 posted on 10/19/2006 11:53:47 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GraceCoolidge

Marcus Alonzo Hanna was an Ohio senator and chairman of the Republican National Committee (or whatever it was then called) in the 1890s. He was easily the most powerful Republican in the country and it is doubtful that anyone would have stood in his way if he had sought the nomination for the presidency. However, he also recognized that he was a somewhat polarizing figure to non-Republicans (as is Newt), so he orchestrated William McKinley's successful campaign and remained McKinley's closest advisor during his presidency.


122 posted on 10/19/2006 11:59:01 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: FreedomProtector
"I think Rove is may actually be more ideologically grounded then Newt, I just think their most gifted talents or the ones they have displayed the brightest are in different areas."



Rove strikes me as someone who is willing to jettison a commitment to limited government if it means growing the GOP's appeal. Of course, that may be more Bush than Rove, but I see it as a little of both. Newt attempts to find a way to communicate Republican ideals to a broader range of people without as much compromise.







"Rove with obvious talents in organizing resources behind elections appears more pragmatic, because figuring out which areas to concentrate on and which to exclude is by nature pragmatic."


I believe that his talent lies more in this area BECAUSE he is more pragmatic than ideological in orientation.




"Newt with obvious talents in formulating policy in concise popular terms appears more ideologically grounded because formulating policy is by nature ideological."



As with Rove, Newt's talents suit his temperament. In short, Newt excels in an area that "is by nature ideological", BECAUSE he tends to be ideologically inclined.
123 posted on 10/19/2006 12:24:58 PM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I don't think a divorcé is someone the GOP ought to run,

Yeah, look at what happened the last time we ran a candidate who had been divorced.

An interesting question. Reagan's was a Hollywood divorce a good 30 years earlier, and no one feels sorry for anyone from Hollywood. People see the stars as indestructable idols, and don't think seriously about either party as a victim.

Today, moral issues and moral consequences are legitimately front-and-center in a way they definitely were not in 1980. And from a merely tactical point of view, a Republican needs to be purer than Caesar's wife, because he needs to survive the attacks of (pro-divorce) media types, who will attack him for being divorced.

Someone like Santorum, rather than Newt, will have more selling power.

124 posted on 10/19/2006 12:38:48 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rob777
"Rove strikes me as someone who is willing to jettison a commitment to limited government if it means growing the GOP's appeal. Of course, that may be more Bush than Rove, but I see it as a little of both. Newt attempts to find a way to communicate Republican ideals to a broader range of people without as much compromise."

Those are valid insightful points, and I don't disagree. I still believe that Rove is ideologically grounded (hard to compare what level with other people), however his job objective/title of winning elections masks or covers his ideology/philosophy.


Politics actually needs both and I believe the struggle between pragmatism and ideology is often the root of many (interparty) debates. There are some things which one should never obviously never compromise on. If one was never pragmatic about where to put resources and careful about which battles to fight, one's philosophy or part of one's philosophy would never be implemented. I believe that when compromising one's ideology as an attempt to get part of it implemented that one should explain their ideology/philosophy and reasons why it is better. This is an area were Republicans have much room for improvement.
125 posted on 10/19/2006 2:53:55 PM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Ronald Reagan was good at all three:

1) Clearly ideologically/philosophically grounded in convervative thought.
2) Was pragmatic [without compromising uncompromisable principles]...[he had to be given congress at the time]...would "rather have a bill that has 75% of what I want then none at all"
3) Explained and articulated conservative ideology/philosophy and reasons why it is clearly better then the alternative, often times humorously.


126 posted on 10/19/2006 3:12:30 PM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

"... the way most people think about what it takes to make a good candidate..." is probably the heart of the delimna.

With our empiricle evidence and history and our trackrecord it's more than amazing that we have gotten along as we have.

Marry that with our insane compulsion to ignore current affairs or alternatively tend to every micro-move an office holder makes, it's remarkable that any sane person even bothers with public life.

One quick look at our "circus" of public servants would chill any normal person. Side show freaks make better associates...when you rattle off just a sampler of who we got up there "taking care of business" Waters,Pelosi, Frank , Conyers, Kerry, Rangel and on and on.

Saints Preserve us!

Where are the Thomas Sowells? The sane ones? We gotta stop this "Gong Show" process that produces circus freaks.


127 posted on 10/19/2006 4:21:23 PM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

Where are the Thomas Sowells? The sane ones? We gotta stop this "Gong Show" process that produces circus freaks.


128 posted on 10/19/2006 7:09:41 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (DeWine ranked as one of the ten worst border security politicians - Human Events)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Thoughts anyone now that the midterms are over and "compassionate conservatism" has effectively dismantled the House that Newt built?
129 posted on 11/08/2006 2:37:03 PM PST by streetpreacher (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: rob777

BTTT


130 posted on 11/08/2006 2:39:52 PM PST by streetpreacher (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson