Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper
We'll never know if you were right because Miers never got a chance to prove herself worthy of the job in front of the Senate panel because conservatives like you spent every day harpooning her nomination by making fun of her by calling her such names as "the cleaning lady". You aren't entitled to the moral high ground for that shameful behavior.

You know, if I had called her "the cleaning lady", you would be right.

However, since I didn't post that (check my past posts if you don't believe me), yet you chose to lump me in with those you did, perhaps a look in the mirror should precede your accusing me of "shameful behavior."

In a SC nomination, there is no room for blind trust - not after Souter. Conservatives were right to demand a better (and more verifiable) choice, even if some were way out of line in insulting Miers personally.

577 posted on 10/18/2006 11:44:50 AM PDT by Ogie Oglethorpe (2nd Amendment - the reboot button on the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]


To: Ogie Oglethorpe
Conservatives were right to demand a better (and more verifiable) choice, even if some were way out of line in insulting Miers personally.

Miers was the one who vetted John Roberts for the job of CJ.

587 posted on 10/18/2006 11:46:52 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson