To: Paradox
Envirowhackos might not be the only ones questioning nuclear power for the probe. I just got done reading a space.com article, and it mentions how the choice of power source can affect the "go/no-go" areas for the probe.
Apparently the mission planners are telling the scientists that a nuke-powered rover will not be allowed to go to any potential water source, like a gulch! It is an issue of (Mars) planetary protection:
- If there were to be a malfunction with the probe, it would be stuck there for a long, long time;
- If the power source on the probe is nuclear, it could be a source of warmth for a long, long time;
- Probes must be assumed to have some non-zero amount of earth microbes that somehow snuck aboard to make it alive to Mars;
- Water, heat, microbes and time add together to form even more microbes (or Godzilla), and that's a contamination issue. While I think this is more of a "science contamination" issue than a "bad for Mars" contamination issue, that's still the concern.
14 posted on
10/18/2006 9:25:47 AM PDT by
Yossarian
(Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity.)
To: Yossarian
Aren't we planing on putting man there by mid-century? I suspect we'll be leaving a few microbes bahind then. And beer cans, cigarette butts, twinkee wrappers.......
15 posted on
10/18/2006 9:53:30 AM PDT by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid. It's also WWIV.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson