The overwhelming majority of Darfur's residents -- that is to say, the genocide's victims -- are Muslims. An article that includes the words "muslim" or "islamic" could be about supposed trends in the global persecution of Muslims just as easily as the blame-Islam-for-everything article you're salivating over.
Islam needs to be exposed for the bloody, barbaric cult which it is. When you have ARAB muslim militias like the "janjaweed" riding through black muslim neighborhoods, (that also include Christians and others), and massacreing them in a racist, genocidal bloodlust, you need to reveal who these folks are. They are MUSLIMS doing what muslims have always done, killing anyone weaker than themselves. When there are no "infidels" around to slaugther, they simply revert to killing each other, (Iran-Iraq war, Iraq tribal warfare, Afghanistan tribal warfare, Sunnis killing Shiites, Shiites killing Kurds, Iraq killing Kuwaitis, etc). Islam is a dark cult of blood and death.
So how can anyone justify writing an article about the genocidal Arab muslim "janjaweed" massacreing tens of thousands of black muslims, without ever using the word "muslim"? The answer is clear, the msm are trying very hard to keep the evils of islam covered in darkness.