Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
The trained and skilled artist can differentiate between a painting done with the eye only and one where a photograph was used to assist.

Given that the best artists use real models when possible, how does that fit in with your theory?

99 posted on 10/18/2006 6:14:15 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
There are bad artists who use "real models" too. The issue is the degree of detail found in what are known as "realism".

Since the human eye cannot, unaided, see that detail and its interactions with other detail (gradations and shades) unassisted, it's really more like photography than naturalistic drawing and painting.

If you prefer that sort of thing, fine. Just don't call it "art".

100 posted on 10/18/2006 6:17:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson