[Clintonfatigued]

28 months in prison is a light sentence. However, it is not such an easy thing for a 67 y/o woman.

Obviously, the judge she was naive and gullible rather than treasonous.

[Free ThinkerNY]

It speaks volumes that he would honor Stewart – who has a history of justifying “revolutionary” violence – after she endorsed the use of terrorism under oath in his courtroom. Longing for a “popular revolution” on the stand, she said America “will not be changed without violence.” Moreover, “You can't always separate out the combatants from the non-combatants.” Nonetheless, she hoped “[p]eople will make the right decision about which to attack,” helpfully adding, “The New York City Board of Education could be one [location] to attack.” Her lawyer, Michael Tigar, objected, claiming these questions dealt with her “abstract political views,” but he let the truth slip in court: “We're getting perilously close to bridges, buildings and tunnels,” the targets envisioned by her client.

Stewart knew exactly what she was doing. She was aiding Islamic terrorists. She wants to see them create more 9/11's. She would dance with joy as more American civilians die. She's not gullible. She's a traitor. The judge is an enabler of evil.

[OldFriend]

Do you think the 58 tourists murdered by the blind shiek's followers at Luxor, Egypt had an easy time?

The judge was not naive. She was encouraged by a former member of the klinton justice department to give this traitorous scum a light sentence.

Stewart signed an agreement with the government that she would NOT carry messages for this convicted terrorist. She never had any intention of obeying the agreement she signed. The jury convicted her, and rightly so. The judge thought he would make light of her crime.

That's what liberal judges put on the bench by klinton and karter....do. They excuse our enemies.