Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1

I agree the guy needs to go to jail, but I am a bit disturbed by the charge of a "terroristic act". I mean, surely ANY act of agression could be said to cause "terror", but his purpose here wasn't to "terrorize" the populace, it was just to get back at someone who "terrorized" him with an obscene gesture.


7 posted on 10/17/2006 8:33:10 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
"I agree the guy needs to go to jail, but I am a bit disturbed by the charge of a "terroristic act". I mean, surely ANY act of aggression could be said to cause "terror", but his purpose here wasn't to "terrorize" the populace, it was just to get back at someone who "terrorized" him with an obscene gesture."

My thoughts as well. What's next - a terroristic hate crime?

20 posted on 10/17/2006 8:42:06 AM PDT by VRWCtaz ("Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness." - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

It's probably like California's legalese lingo...I was on a jury a few months ago (attempted murder), and one of the charges was "making terrorist threats"...because the perp had of course said "I'm going to kill you", before he emptied his .45 at his target (and missed)


23 posted on 10/17/2006 8:45:12 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I agree the guy needs to go to jail, but I am a bit disturbed by the charge of a "terroristic act". I mean, surely ANY act of agression could be said to cause "terror", but his purpose here wasn't to "terrorize" the populace, it was just to get back at someone who "terrorized" him with an obscene gesture.

Agreed. This is just like the fruitcakes who want to make certain crimes "hate crimes" in addition to whatever else the crime may be. That's a foolish abuse of the statutes.

29 posted on 10/17/2006 8:53:06 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
"but his purpose here wasn't to "terrorize" the populace, it was just to get back at someone who "terrorized" him with an obscene gesture."

lol... your priorities are all screwed up. What is more terrorizing, chasing, trying to run someone off the road, and honking your horn trying to get them to stop so you can fight them, and shooting at them with a cross bow? or an obscene gesture? People with road rage terrorize everyone they share the road with. I think the charge of 'terroristic act' is perfectly appropriate.
35 posted on 10/17/2006 9:02:55 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I don't think obscene gestures qualify as an effort to terrorize. It's more of an effort to humiliate someone.

Shooting or brandishing a crossbow at someone clearly is an effort to make them fear you, and if you're actually trying to kill them- even if too drunk to hit them- then it's attempted murder.

66 posted on 10/18/2006 2:40:16 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I understand your concern, but I believe it is merely a legal term that found it's way into laws before the present "High Profile" meaning the term has.

Teaxas and other states have similarly titled laws. The one in TX deals with acts against both and individuals and entities. I don't remember the date it wsa enacted off hand.


75 posted on 10/18/2006 4:08:50 AM PDT by 5Madman2 (There is no such thing as an experienced suicide bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson