Posted on 10/17/2006 8:08:21 AM PDT by Hadean
To: Assignment Desk, Daybook Editor
Contact: Mike Rogers of Proud of Who We Are, 202-667-1639
News Advisory:
Mike Rogers, the nation's top gay activist blogger, will make a major announcement today about a key figure in Idaho's political establishment.
Rogers, the president of Proud of Who We Are, will make the announcement Tuesday, Oct. 17, at 3:30 p.m. Mountain time (2:30 p.m. Pacific / 5:30 p.m. Eastern) on the nationally syndicated Ed Schultz Show. On the show, Rogers will reveal his reporting on the hypocrisy of this prominent politician and call on him to tell the truth to Idaho citizens.
The Ed Schultz Show is broadcast on stations across the country, including 1280 AM in Spokane, Washington. The show can also be heard live in streaming audio at http://www.bigeddieradio.com.
Rogers has been a leading gay activist voice in the fallout of the Mark Foley scandal. Over the last two weeks, he has been featured on NPR's "All Things Considered," Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor," MSNBC's "Tucker," CNN Headline News's "Nancy Grace," the Ed Schultz Show, and a number of other national programs.
You are correct and I worry about what will happen to this nation when we turn completely from God and embrace behavior like this.
Just listened to Rogers and he claims to have statements and other information from men who have had sexual contact with Senator Larry Craig from Idaho.
so you believe that public displays of recreational sex fetishes are ok for our public officials?
What if this person's "life partner" is a dog. Should Condi Rice introduce him as his sex partner Spot?
Perhaps we should have a wife swaper czar?
Every sex fetish should have their own czar.
As the various scandals involving homsoexuals show, they should not be around minors. Their selected sex fetish precludes them from not only being around children but representing the 98% of the population that is normal.
claims?
what does the senator say?
Rogers says that Craig's office will not return his phone calls, etc.
Anything yet?
See #102
I was right.
Ok, now what? What if Senator Craig does not respond to these claims, citing they are not worth a response? What then?
Would it be safe to assume that Senator Craig is up for reelection this year? Just a wild hunch.
And why should we believe this blogger or his sources? Short of unaltered photos or videos that is....
Craig is not up for re-election this year, AFAIK...
Thanks for the info, I was guessing they were trying to kill two or more birds with one stone.
I'm not that surprised. I'd heard whispers about this when he was still a Congressman. IIRC, he didn't get married until relatively late in life.
Hopefully, the encounters (if true and that is a big if) are in the distant past and he has put that lifestyle behind him. He is a good senator. He has a good voting record even if these accusations are true.
I didn't say that. What I said was that I do not vote based on the sexuality of the candidate. I actually don't care for public displays of recreational sex for anyone, regardless of orientation. And actually, there are many homosexuals out there who are NOT "acting out", for lack of a better phrase.
So many of your "arguments", and I'm being kind, are pure foolishness. Where you came up with Every sex fetish should have their own czar. based on my post is unknown. Lay off the strawnmen - you may get slivers.
As the various scandals involving homsoexuals show, they should not be around minors. Their selected sex fetish precludes them from not only being around children but representing the 98% of the population that is normal.
Sorry - I judge the individual, not the group. It's an American thing, ya know?
Thanks for defining a Republican for me, I never knew that I was supposed to hate homosexuals. Whew, you kept me from making a tremendous mistake (not caring what someone does in their bedroom). Next your going to tell me that if I am not 100% behind the death penalty I can't be a Republican either.
Where can I get the handbook, since there is so much I don't know.
BTW. I am against gay marriage, sligthly pro death penalty, and 100% pro life, but I can't stand other people defining what we should believe. I think that homosexuality is a sin, but as long as they are not promoting their agenda, and just loving each other, I will leave that sin up to God.
When Studds and Crane got caught with the interns in 1983, Rep Craig at the time held a press conference denying he had an intern problem. But nobody accused him in the press of it anyways. That is why folks got suspicious back then.
Larry Craig on Civil Rights
Click here for 13 full quotes on Civil Rights OR background on Civil Rights.
Voted YES on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration. (Jun 2006)
Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women. (Mar 1998)
Voted YES on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)
Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
Voted YES on Amendment to prohibit flag burning. (Dec 1995)
Voted YES on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)
Supports anti-flag desecration amendment. (Mar 2001)
Rated 25% by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
The link:
http://www.govote.com/Senate/Larry_Craig.htm
Then we are all supposed to run around crazy with worry because he might be gay.
Seriously, if he is not supporting the gay agenda...I don't give a running rats toot.
He's a solid conservative, and I hope he ignores this idiot radical homosexual.
Here our Secretary of State was up there saying "I would like to honor this man who sticks his penis in other men"
Just out of curiousity, should she say at some other swearing in, "I would like to honor this man who sticks his penis in women"?
I don't agree with Condi Rice on everything, but in this case, she acted as head of the State department - diplomatically.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.