Skip to comments.
Denmark an Example After Transfat Ban
Associated Press ^
| 10/16/2006
| Maria Cheng
Posted on 10/17/2006 7:08:12 AM PDT by xrp
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: xrp
Preserving the delicacy of the traditional Danish pastries was a major concern I thought the "traditional Danish pastries" were made with butter anyway. Did they slide in transfats instead of butter to save money/extend shelf life? Will they now go back to butter? Or (the article says they're "experimenting") will they come up with some other gawdawful substitute?
Personally, I love Crisco for pie crust and cookies (except maybe butter cookies). But Danish pastries are supposed to be made with butter!
21
posted on
10/17/2006 8:09:13 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: Clintonfatigued
Citizens should definitely think for themselves, but the producers and sellers of food need to be honest about what they actually put into food, and has an obligation not to add things that are destructive to general health. When I buy bread, I check the content - and buy bread with flour, water, salt and leaven or yeast only.
When I buy dairy products like sour cream I check that no carrageen guar carob gums are added. If the reading of content takes me more that few seconds I do not buy it.
Still it is possible because of government regulations which insure that the content is displayed properly.
22
posted on
10/17/2006 8:14:15 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(1Tm:6:10: "the love of money is the root of all evil")
To: longtermmemmory
And all that organic spinach and lettuce from California without the natural ingredient E.Coli listed...MMMM...MMMM. good.
To: Physicist
No, but each Dane will be a little bit poorer, and eat food that is a little bit more stale. It is better to eat a little less and of better quality. You will have fewer human hippos clogging the medical clinics.
You should rethink your concept of wealth.
24
posted on
10/17/2006 8:17:43 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(It is better to have $5M and live in Weston Massachusetts than to have $20M and to live in Bogota.)
To: xrp
I would like to see the states in the US adopt similar laws. Transfats are very harmful to a person's health. Also, they are totally unnecessary. At home, my Wife and I never eat foods that have transfats. However, when we eat out, we never know what restaurants fry their french fries, fried chicken, etc. I avoid eating KFC and McDonalds friend foods since I know they use cooking oils that contain transfats. Other places, if I don't know, I don't eat foods that may have transfats.
When I was in my teens and twenties, before I became more focused on my health eating habits, I probably did prodigious damage to my circulatory system. Had this law been in force, perhaps that would not be the case.
To: Physicist
Five years from now they will find that trans-fats reduced the incidence of cancer or some such thing.
26
posted on
10/17/2006 8:28:44 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: xrp
Well by all means, let's go back to the day when there was no food regulation and businesses put whatever they wanted in edibles.
Transfat is a serious problem.
27
posted on
10/17/2006 8:38:11 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
To: xrp
I know I'm cynical, but I don't think measures like this are because government officials care about your life. Hell, they don't even know you. What they do care about is the amount of money you can generate, and for how long, to the inc you work for and to the government that depends on you for financing.
28
posted on
10/17/2006 8:47:47 AM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Imagine if they had to use REAL SUGAR (as in cane) instead of fructose corn syrup as a sweetener.
29
posted on
10/17/2006 8:50:06 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Well by all means, let's go back to the day when there was no food regulation and businesses put whatever they wanted in edibles. And in soft drinks :)
30
posted on
10/17/2006 8:52:50 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(It is better to have $5M and live in Weston Massachusetts than to have $20M and to live in Bogota.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Could you imagine the sales plunge if ingrediants had to be explained in PLAIN ENGLISH!
Why those products that use euphamisms for MSG would gain dust on the shelves!
31
posted on
10/17/2006 8:58:56 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: xrp
Denmark is also a major producer of butter (and damn good butter at that), which directly competes with products that generally contain trans-fat.
To: A. Pole
At the State Fair of Texas the newest fried food is
FRIED COKE!
To: longtermmemmory
Oh come now, don't try to be logical.. don't you realize this is a liberty issue!! Corps should be free to sell deadly and dangerous things to the public.. who's the government to say that can't?
/SARCASM
Seriously, its a simple public health issue. When hydrogenated oils were introduced no one knew the dangers, if they had, they likely would never have been allowed to go to market. Now the dangers are known and policy will correctly change.
There was a time Coca Cola actually had Cocaine in it too.. history is full of examples of products being outlawed after safety or other issues are found... But don't try to tell that to some folks... its an infringement on their life worthy of taking up arms....
To: HamiltonJay
Oh come now, don't try to be logical.. don't you realize this is a liberty issue!! Corps should be free to sell deadly and dangerous things to the public.. who's the government to say that can't? Something tells me that the owners and managers of these corporations do not eat the crap they produce.
35
posted on
10/17/2006 9:23:30 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(It is better to have $5M and live in Weston Massachusetts than to have $20M and to live in Bogota.)
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
Transfats are very harmful to a person's health. Also, they are totally unnecessary.Just like cigarettes. Should those be banned also?
However, when we eat out, we never know what restaurants fry their french fries, fried chicken, etc.
Uhm...have you tried asking? If I am trying a new dish at a restaurant, I ALWAYS ask "how is this prepared?"
36
posted on
10/17/2006 9:36:04 AM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: xrp
The french fries are still crispy. The pastries are still scrumptious. And the fried chicken is still tasty.And freedom has been lost.
37
posted on
10/17/2006 9:45:11 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Vaquero
if you are going to a restaurant and eating food fried in the equivilent of WD-40, when do you get to think about what you are eating.Uh, you're supposed to think about it before you order it.
38
posted on
10/17/2006 9:46:38 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: xrp
I will not be satisfied until there is a government plan that regulates every single activity I engage in, or contemplate engaging in, every single day of my life.
I will, of course, need an armed government agent to accompany me so that I do not commit any 'crimes of action or inaction'.
39
posted on
10/17/2006 9:53:26 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a pathological disorder masquerading as a religion.)
To: HamiltonJay
40
posted on
10/17/2006 9:54:15 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a pathological disorder masquerading as a religion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson