I was always pretty sure she would support torture of members of the "Vast, Right Wing Conspiracy".
I'm only surprised if she would support the torture of Islamofascists, but she really didn't say that, did she?
Posted on 10/16/2006 12:30:34 PM PDT by presidio9
"In the event we were ever confronted with having to interrogate a detainee with knowledge of an imminent threat to millions of Americans, then the decision to depart from standard international practices must be made by the President, and the President must be held accountable," she said.
Why should we be surprised? She supports intimidation and murder of those who were a threat to the Clintons.
I was always pretty sure she would support torture of members of the "Vast, Right Wing Conspiracy".
I'm only surprised if she would support the torture of Islamofascists, but she really didn't say that, did she?
"In my, my wife and children are not allowed to say Hillary's name. They refer to her as "She who's name must no be spoken"."
Today my college Spanish professor mentioned something about Hitlery being elected president and there was actually a chorus of groans. There may be hope.
The only people I know of to have publicly favored torture are Democrats - specifically, Clinton and Dershowitz.
That doesn't stop them from using it as a club to beat the Repubs with.
Well, she's been torturing us for years - why not a terrorist or two? I think she could do a jam-up job. She could just read the telephone book to them and they would spill their guts.
Ouch! It must be torture for her to say this!
Just think of all the friends she has to call to tell them her words are just for public consumption and that she means to do no such thing if elected.
And this will be considered a "reasonable" approach to the issue.
Of course she supports tortue of our enemies, the only enemy she sees is Republicans.
My thoughts exactly!
Well how do you know they pose a mortal threat to millions of americans unless you put the screws to them first
well, exposing the excremists to her visage and sounds is about the right amount of torture.
Hillary's finger is stuck up in the wind as the polls blow. She has her base no matter what, but she does not have those who don't trust liberals with defense. If she needed the Muslim vote to win, she would be working it, working it, working it from that angle. Bill and Hillary are anything the voters they need to win want - until they get their power, then they become what they always really were.
Already posted...about her defending torture.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3966944c34b9.htm
"The Panther leaders who were on trial all thought it was okay to torture and murder somebody. That’s what Hillary Clinton was defending, people who thought it was okay to torture and murder somebody."
if they really want to torture someone make them look at a picture of her for 5 minutes
this postures the question superbly. At what point in her opinion is the comfort level of a known hostile that wants to kill Americans more valuable than (X)American lives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.