Skip to comments.
Misleading Measure May Launch U.S. Cloning (MO Amend. 2)
The Chicago Sun-Times ^
| Oct. 16, 2006
| Robert Novak
Posted on 10/16/2006 10:42:25 AM PDT by Forest Keeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Novak was on the Laura Ingraham radio program this morning and called the efforts of the pro-Amendment 2 anti-lifers (promoting the Amendment as one that would ban cloning) one of the biggest scams he has ever seen in politics.
To: Forest Keeper
It all depends. If, say, Ronald the Great is to be cloned - then OK [the constitutional limit of 2 terms already served would not apply to the clone, and after that we could grow yet another one]. If, OTOH, they are trying to clone hillary - then the place better be burned down together with everyone in it.
2
posted on
10/16/2006 10:46:51 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; Lord_Calvinus; Gamecock; wmfights; Frumanchu; nobdysfool
Prior conversation ping. :)
To: Forest Keeper; Admin Moderator
4
posted on
10/16/2006 10:49:24 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: GSlob
I'd rather have the Kobe Tai clone I ordered.
5
posted on
10/16/2006 10:52:56 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Everyone keep clam!)
To: Forest Keeper
called the efforts of the pro-Amendment 2 anti-lifers (promoting the Amendment as one that would ban cloning) one of the biggest scams he has ever seen in politics. Only if you believe that the clone of George Bush is a cell with his DNA rather than a walking, talking human being that looks like a fraternal twin. When most people think of a clone of a sheep (Dolly), a cat or a human being, they are thinking of a sheep, a cat, a human being, not a clump of cells with identical DNA.
6
posted on
10/16/2006 10:54:49 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: Just another Joe; Admin Moderator
Thread already going.OK, thanks. This was my first shot at it. I did at least TRY to search. :) Need more practice I guess.
To: GSlob
It all depends. If, say, Ronald the Great is to be cloned - then OK ...In theory, sure. :) The problem is that the good guys aren't going to be the ones volunteering their DNA. We'd more likely end up with an army of liberal professor drones coming to save us. :)
To: GSlob
Hopefully you're being sarcastic.
As a Missourian, I can verify that #2 is deceptive in many ways. You can read the entire text at the Secretary of State's website:
www.sos.mo.gov/elections/2006petitions/ppStemCell.asp
Freepers with friends and/or relatives in Missouri, please tell them about the dangers and deceptions of Amendment 2.
9
posted on
10/16/2006 11:10:14 AM PDT
by
Prov3456
To: Dave S
Only if you believe that the clone of George Bush is a cell with his DNA rather than a walking, talking human being that looks like a fraternal twin. Well, what do you think the necessary implications are if Amendment 2 passes? You can't really think that the left will stop with cloning cells, do you? This thing is the definition of incrementalism and the slippery slope. This is exactly how it works. Science by unGodly men will achieve whatever it can. When governments give their blessings, it just makes it all the easier.
To: Forest Keeper
This was my first shot at it. I did at least TRY to search. :) Need more practice I guess.Different titles.
11
posted on
10/16/2006 12:18:49 PM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: wagglebee; little jeremiah; cpforlife.org
Help spread the word PING! :)
To: Prov3456
To: Forest Keeper; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
I hope the good citizens in Missouri figure the truth out pretty quickly. Sickening that so many Republicans are either fooled by this or in on it (what is the motive? Money? Attraction to death cultism?
Moral Absolutes Ping!
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
To: Forest Keeper; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
15
posted on
10/17/2006 8:28:00 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
To: Forest Keeper
My s-i-l was talking about this legislation last week during my hubby's family reunion. She and her hubby live in MO, and she is appalled by this measure.
16
posted on
10/18/2006 7:32:22 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: little jeremiah
Sickening that so many Republicans are either fooled by this or in on it (what is the motive? Money? Attraction to death cultism?Many folks are cowed by their fear of being considered unsophisticated, or anti-science by those pushing the measure. They won't speak out, even though they might not actually vote for it.
17
posted on
10/18/2006 7:36:04 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: SuziQ
I was thinking of the GOP big wigs's motives, not so much the ordinary folks. The people who are pushing this.
To: Coleus
Thanks for the great resources, Coleus! You have done a tremendous job on these issues.
To: Forest Keeper
Oh they are very very tricky in their deceptive writing skills and if anyone would like I will type the proposed amendment for all to read.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson