Carter's like Clinton - he's searching for a legacy that doesn't exist. As I've said before, Jimmah must have been pea green with envy at the lavish honors and sincere mourning felt when Ronaldus Magnus left us - and knowing that in the end, his death will barely cause of ripple. A failed man, a failed presidency, a failed diplomacy. Yes, he won the Nobel Peace Prize - but that accolade lost its luster the day Yassir Arafat put the word "laureate" next to his name.
And he was awarded the NPP for his diplomatic handling of North Korea's nuclear situation - which is now, of course, a disaster. But blame Bush for this, Jimmah - I'm sure the tin foil brigade still believes in you.
I disagree. Carter is far more dangerous than Clinton.
Clinton's actions were driven by personal gain and long-term effect on his "legacy."
Carter's actions both in office and after leaving have been to detriment of American interests. Just about every foreign policy problem we have in the world today can be traced to Carter.
I believe that Clinton only cares about himself, therefore he neither loves nor hates America. Carter on the other hand, I believe truly hates America and has been assisting our enemies in working to destroy us for at least thirty years.