Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Koreans Have Had Enough Engagement - Have a big reality check
Captain's Quarters ^

Posted on 10/15/2006 8:31:56 PM PDT by sgtyork

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: sgtyork
When I was in Korea in the late '80's there were still plenty of Koreans that would come up to an American and thank them for stopping the Communists. It was only in those years that the South Korean economy surged to the point where they could prevail over the north. The South Korean Army was plenty aggressive, but remember that the North Koreans have 1 million men under arms - a million!

One million men under arms... And this means, what? That North Korea will march everyone to the border and proceed to walk south? Raiding people's homes for food, since they don't presently have the infrastructure to maintain supply lines?

We provided an incredibly valuable service. But like everything, there comes a time for things to end. Us guarding the DMZ is past prime. They can handle the job themselves.
21 posted on 10/15/2006 9:03:49 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle
It's too bad that no leader in this country will ever have Truman's stomach.

Shame that Truman didn't have it, either.

22 posted on 10/15/2006 9:08:19 PM PDT by BubbaHeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle

"It's too bad that no leader in this country will ever have Truman's stomach."

We have the most powerful military in the history of the world, but it looks like one or more of our cities will be toasted by nukes before we actually use it.

Then we we will be able to elect a leader like Truman who has the will to protect our people by any means necessary.


23 posted on 10/15/2006 9:11:57 PM PDT by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Half a century of having some other nation guarding your border because you won't do it yourself? Yell yes, I'd be pissed at my government and the government of the troops.

We provided an incredibly valuable service. But like everything, there comes a time for things to end. Us guarding the DMZ is past prime. They can handle the job themselves.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I can agree with the second statement, could not the first. Where else in the world was there ever an alliance where two nations stood together so well for so long? All things change, but our valuable service - and their commitment to their defense - should be honored.


24 posted on 10/15/2006 9:13:08 PM PDT by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

I fully agree with your assessment. To think that the PRK can take and hold ground on the pennisula is ridiculous. They need the nukes for blackmail and hard currency.

I can't believe the number of people here that favor a cut and run policy. South Korean is one of our best friends in the world. We're not going to better our position in the world by throwing our friends under the bus.


25 posted on 10/15/2006 9:22:27 PM PDT by claudiustg (Iran delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork
In less than a week since North Korea claimed to have tested a nuclear weapon, public opinion in the South has turned sharply against a South Korean policy of engaging the enemy in the belief it will eventually bring peace on the divided peninsula.

It'll last for a few months. Then they'll be back to hating us. Democracies have the attention span of a gnat and think that wishing on a star is the proper way to set public policy.

26 posted on 10/15/2006 10:00:27 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork
This is good news. The South Koreans' attitude towards the North was a major obstacle to dealing with Kim as he deserves.

The other major obstacle will not change as quickly, unfortunately, and that is the accident of geography that has millions of South Koreans in Seoul living within artillery range of the North. Tough question. They are basically hostages. The North would attack Seoul if we took any action against them, even a naval blockade, or began to evacuate the city.

-ccm

27 posted on 10/15/2006 10:17:28 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BubbaHeel
I think you're overlooking this.
28 posted on 10/15/2006 10:26:15 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork
Even President Roh acknowledges that the test has neutered his policy, but that realization comes too late to undo the damage.

Why do we ALWAYS have to wait until it's too late to undo the damage???

29 posted on 10/15/2006 10:41:31 PM PDT by parisa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork; All

Great editorial from Captain's Quarters. Interesting thread. Thanks.


30 posted on 10/15/2006 11:07:34 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

You act as though those lunatics use reason and logic and therefore when reason says not to invade or try they won't.
I wish I shared your optimism.


31 posted on 10/16/2006 6:35:20 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

"It isn't personal, Sonny. It's business."


32 posted on 10/16/2006 6:36:13 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

I think a decapitation would work in this instance ,,, they have no Air Force or Navy and at best 1980's Soviet air defenses... so what if they have a million man army ,,, they're not in the army for love of "dear leader" ,, they're in the army because they want to eat more than one meal of rice and bugs a day... AC-130's A10's and B-52's with bomblets will stop any advance by an unsupported ground force... after all the war there isn't over we just called a time out 50 years ago..


33 posted on 10/16/2006 1:19:12 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

There is no doubt that we would slaughter the NKs but there is also no doubt that there would be enormous death and destruction meted out to the SKs.


34 posted on 10/16/2006 1:52:27 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson