Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jaguarbhzrd; nmh
J: Because of theological differences, I have often disagreed on this site (sometimes quite enthusiastically) with nmh, but I can assure you that nmh's faith is quite strong, is anything but weak and is based on nmh's fervent belief in God and God's Word. Nmh is not among those who insist that apes were their forebears.

God is the author of all nature and of science. That which disagrees with God is neither science nor Truth nor truth.

594 posted on 10/16/2006 5:52:09 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

I see, so the Big Bang theory must be bad as well, and any hypothesis of abiogenesis must be a bad hypothesis as well?

Perhaps Geology is a bad science because it shows a 4 1/2 billion year old earth?

How about Chemistry? Aeronautical engineering? archeaology? perhaps physics is against God as well?

If science looked at it's theories, and decided what it could and could not study, based upon the religious sensibilities of believers who are weak in their faith, then we would still be living in the dark ages.

No thanks.


597 posted on 10/16/2006 5:56:46 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson