To: antiRepublicrat
The ToE happens to be the best science we have on the subject. We do have a lot of data suggesting that evolution took place. But we do not have a real theory of evolution/ToE yet. Neither of the two XIX centuries theories (Darwin or Lamarck) cut the mustard. Nor the Jurassic Park movie is enough.
We need a new synthesis with the date, name of the author and defined claims. Science is not that different in this aspect from patent law.
290 posted on
10/15/2006 3:07:08 PM PDT by
A. Pole
(" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! Bazaar Akbar! ")
To: A. Pole
" We do have a lot of data suggesting that evolution took place. But we do not have a real theory of evolution/ToE yet. Neither of the two XIX centuries theories (Darwin or Lamarck) cut the mustard. Nor the Jurassic Park movie is enough. Where the heck did you get that idea?
"We need a new synthesis with the date, name of the author and defined claims. Science is not that different in this aspect from patent law.
It is very different.
What makes you think any theory should be date stamped and labeled?
509 posted on
10/16/2006 1:27:19 PM PDT by
b_sharp
(evolution is not, generally speaking, a global optimiser, but a general satisficer -J. Wilkins)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson