Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dr_who_2
Ok, my misunderstanding. However, you know, then, that the nature of the Constitution was to PROHIBIT rapid change, and it is precisely this which we have been battling. My estimate is that to get what we want, we need 40 CONSERVATIVES in the senate, and about 40% of the House Republicans to be conservatives. That means in the Senate we need close to 60 GOP votes. You have to provide enough cover for the lamebrains that every once in a while they can do the right thing and say they "had to," and still throw the RINOs some social issue votes.

Conservatives get all whipped up about what the GOP "hasn't done," without remembering it is precisely the intent of the Constitution to force groups/factions/parties to come back, year after year, to build bigger majorities for a change. Aside from the Civil War, when fully half of the Congress---and virtually all of the opposition---was gone, and the Great Depression, where the mandate for "doing something" was so great and the majorities so large, it really takes about 40 years to get important issues acted upon. The Great Society was still needed by the Dems DESPITE having the FDR blitzkrieg 30 years earlier.

71 posted on 10/14/2006 6:10:43 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: LS

I would say there isn't much in the constitution about political patronage, entitlements, pork barrel spending, gerrymandering, and so-called "campaign finance reform". As for the bicameral legislature issue, that does slow things down a little, but not as much when you have a President in the majority party and not as much when you have extra-constitutional senate rules to contend with.


72 posted on 10/14/2006 6:19:14 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: LS; Common Tator; x
Heh, CT, you old crust --- hope you're out recovering and having fun as usual.

Thought you'd enjoy this post no. 71 by LS, which adheres to your old and steadfast theories of American politics. I can only add to LS's post that it's impossible to define and measure what has not happened , which is the very largest of the GOP's accomplishments. (For example, I credit Taft with halting the worst designs of the progressives; we could view every other post-Civil War era in the same light.)

The genius of the Founders lies herein, and you, LS, and x are the most very aware FR advocates of it.

All the best to you, CT!

86 posted on 10/15/2006 8:01:11 PM PDT by nicollo (All economics are politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson