Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky
This could be a smart move by Fox. It puts them in a position to reject all the democrats' unsubstantiated attack ads in the closing weeks of the election -- in order to be fair and balanced, "showing neither fear nor favor" to either side. And since the decision to drop this ad has generated "controversy," Fox can now interview primetime guests who are eager to provide "proof" of Clinton's culpability at greater length than an ad could. Wouldn't it glorious if Fox, following such reveleations, admitted it had been mistaken and announced that it would, afterall, run the ad since it now appears to be supported by the facts?

Okay, I just woke up. What a strange dream.

40 posted on 10/14/2006 10:52:02 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bonaparte
I just read your post. Yes, I do hope you are right and Fox reverses their decision and now runs the ad.

I'll paste in here what I've just posted several times above... the Fox representative told WND things that contradict what they told MAF.

--------------------------

That is not an accurate statement by Fox News, and Move America Forward has notified WorldNetDaily with this point. They did NOT ask at any time for documentation, otherwise we would have been HAPPY to provide it, and stand ready to do so. The 9/11 report, the statements by CIA Bin Laden group agent, Michael Scheuer, are just the tip of the iceberg. The network told us the following:

"we cannot run the Clinton commercial as there is no way to defend the allegations"

59 posted on 10/14/2006 4:34:30 PM PDT by Impeach98 (Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson