"A spokesman for Fox News told WND that the advertisement made a claim about Clinton that wasn't documented, so the ad wasn't accepted."
Oh really? How about this for documentation?
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/main/AAoil.html
Still don't think ADVERTISERS call the shots at FOX?
dgallo: Read my last several posts above. The problem here is that what the Fox representative told WND is NOT what happened. MAF would gladly have provided documentation. They said there was no way to prove the claims and would not run the ad. Period.