To: RegulatorCountry
I completely disagree.
If Hillary & friends were behind this they wouldn't have it coming to light 4 weeks prior to the most important mid-term election in US history.
They would have waited until November 10, 2006
46 posted on
10/13/2006 7:39:07 AM PDT by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: DCPatriot
I completely disagree. If Hillary & friends were behind this they wouldn't have it coming to light 4 weeks prior to the most important mid-term election in US history. They would have waited until November 10, 2006
Maybe Hillary wants the Dems to lose this election so that she can replace Dingy Harry, not have to compete with a Speaker Pelosi AND be the savior of the Dems going into '08.
To: DCPatriot; RegulatorCountry; SDGOP
If Hillary & friends were behind this they wouldn't have it coming to light 4 weeks prior to the most important mid-term election in US history. I'd be inclined to agree with you except for the fact that Mark Warner also announced this week he's not running for President.
I think it's actually to Hillary's advantage for the RATS not to retake control of Congress. They'll go for impeachment, insist on bringing the troops home, raise our taxes.
If they did take over, she'd be trying to run for the White House with most of the country saying "Dear Lord, what have we done?"
To: DCPatriot
"If Hillary & friends were behind this they wouldn't have it coming to light 4 weeks prior to the most important mid-term election in US history."
what would you say was the second-most important mid-term election in US history?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson