Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldenuff2no

While Madonna isn't the mother I would choose for a child, I agree with you. This child is better off with someone here adopting him. Even Madonna. While I understand the desire to keep children within the community where they were born and have kin, these third-world countries have done an atrocious job of making their countries the kind of place where you would want to raise a child. Regardless of her motives, she is contributing money to help the children in the country. And this child would not have been in a home with real parents. He would have been in an orphanage. Do they really think a child in their orphanages would be better off than with most American families? If they make their country a safe and economically viable placer to raise a family, then I might agree with the concerns they've expressed.


66 posted on 10/13/2006 7:29:56 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: twigs
Regardless of her motives, she is contributing money to help the children in the country.

I hear that the contribution has a few strings attached to it. Part of the money is earmarked to helping the children learn all about Kabbalah.
71 posted on 10/13/2006 8:26:53 AM PDT by dmartin (Who Dares Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson