Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political science
The Washington Times ^ | October 12, 2006 | TODAY'S EDITORIAL

Posted on 10/12/2006 5:05:45 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

Credit the newsmaking scientists at Johns Hopkins with this: They know a political opportunity when they see one. This latest Iraq war-death estimate -- 655,000, four times higher than anyone else's -- is released a few weeks before Election 2006, just like their last Lancet study, which appeared right before the 2004 election. Here we are again, watching science meet anti-war politics. Yesterday the study got generous coverage in The Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere. Why that happened is unclear, because the scientists -- the lead author this time is Dr. Gilbert Burnham, last time Dr. Les Roberts -- burned the media in 2004 by irresponsibly hyping a supposed death total of 100,000. The signs of politicization were clear enough: One author admitted to politically motivated timing. Lancet editor Richard Horton called the war "grievously in error." And sure enough, as Slate's Fred Kaplan showed, the study actually proved no such figure. Sampling Iraqis around the country by interview, the authors' survey really determined that the death toll in 2004 was somewhere between 8,000 and 194,000. As Mr. Kaplan put it: "This isn't an estimate. It's a dart board." Every other credible group or analyst put the number in the range of 15,000-30,000. The 100,000 estimate was nevertheless declared to be "conservative" by these political scientists.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fauxscience; iraq; johnshopkins
Is there still such a thing as legitimate science anymore?
1 posted on 10/12/2006 5:05:45 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"Lies, damn lies, and statistics."


2 posted on 10/12/2006 5:10:43 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Stop the "tyranny of the 'offended' " -- say what you mean and stand by it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Nope, not when that scientific research is led or funded by those who want a particular outcome that would garner vast media attention.


3 posted on 10/12/2006 5:13:26 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Where do you bury 655,000 persons? You'd be able to see the sheer number of fresh graves from space! I demand satellite photo proof!


4 posted on 10/12/2006 5:18:41 AM PDT by AngrySpud (Behold, I am The Anti-Crust ... Anti-Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; Uncle Ike

Yes, there is legitimate science. I suggest reading/joining The Science Wars. Paul Gross and Norman Levitt wrote the seminal Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels With Science (JHU, 1994) and edited NYAS conference minutes The Flight From Science and Reason. This latter's bibliography should keep one busy for a long time.

On line is Science Warrior Alan Sokal who wrote http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html

Transgressing the Boundaries illuminates well the follies of the CrEvo hysteria. Sound and fury signifying nothing. Tagline...


5 posted on 10/12/2006 5:21:55 AM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

And the 655,000 figure does not include the additional 70,000 kidnapped by the US' ally, the Klingon Empire...


6 posted on 10/12/2006 5:31:14 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud

Haven't you heard? We're serving them in USMC mess halls.


7 posted on 10/12/2006 5:34:27 AM PDT by metesky (My investment program is holding steady @ .05ยข a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Well, they've been beamed up, no methodology to accurately capture that figure.


8 posted on 10/12/2006 5:42:00 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Appeasement never works. It only encourages new and escalating demands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud

I figure they ground them up and provided lime for the tulips. You didn't know Karl E. Rove Super Genius liked growing tulips?


9 posted on 10/12/2006 5:44:22 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Appeasement never works. It only encourages new and escalating demands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"Is there still such a thing as legitimate science anymore?"

Awww, come on guy, it's so simple maybe you need a refresher course. [leans arm on hot engine part, then jumps away] Heyya! It's all ball bearings nowadays!


10 posted on 10/12/2006 6:06:31 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Mark Foley is what happens when personal character isn't relevant to voters or party leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Political Science (Randy Newman)

No one likes us-I don't know why
We may not be perfect, but heaven knows we try
But all around, even our old friends put us down
Let's drop the big one and see what happens

We give them money-but are they grateful?
No, they're spiteful and they're hateful
They don't respect us-so let's surprise them
We'll drop the big one and pulverize them

Asia's crowded and Europe's too old
Africa is far too hot
And Canada's too cold
And South America stole our name
Let's drop the big one
There'll be no one left to blame us

We'll save Australia
Don't wanna hurt no kangaroo
We'll build an All American amusement park there
They got surfin', too

Boom goes London and boom Paris
More room for you and more room for me
And every city the whole world round
Will just be another American town
Oh, how peaceful it will be
We'll set everybody free
You'll wear a Japanese kimono
And there'll be Italian shoes for me

They all hate us anyhow
So let's drop the big one now
Let's drop the big one now


11 posted on 10/12/2006 6:11:15 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Mark Foley is what happens when personal character isn't relevant to voters or party leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

All I know of poly sci is that future lawyers have to major in it.


12 posted on 10/12/2006 10:33:16 AM PDT by Ciexyz (Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson