Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

By "previously" we could be talking 1953 here.


8 posted on 10/11/2006 7:08:13 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
By "previously" we could be talking 1953 here.

Yep, my first thought as well.

"52,000 US military casualties"?? Horse manure.

16 posted on 10/11/2006 7:12:32 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill
"By "previously" we could be talking 1953 here."

By 1953 the Korean War was over, there were 55,000 deaths and many, many more casualties, so this is a recent estimate by a fearful leadership with no vision, no effective strategies (such as a massive and prolonged bombing campaign). Anyway, it's a red herring in an effort to save face for the White House, because we don't need to attack Poingyang, we need to drop a few tactical nukes or huge conventional bombs on their nuclear weapons sites. There is no need to take on the entire country.

171 posted on 10/11/2006 10:03:33 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson