Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CounterCounterCulture

Looks good to me!

--

Section 1 - Addition of Article I, Section 26, to the California Constitution Article I, Section 26, is hereby added to the California Constitution as follows:

SEC. 26.

(a) The State shall not authorize or provide to any alien not lawfully in the United States, a driver’s license or government identification card, exemption from nonresident tuition or fees for postsecondary education, grant, contract, loan, professional license, or commercial license; or any retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or assisted housing, postsecondary education, food assistance, unemployment benefit, or any other similar benefit to an individual, household, or family eligibility unit, unless those benefits or services are required to be provided pursuant to federal law.

(b) For the purposes of this section, “State” shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the State itself, any city, county, city and county, township, public university system, community college district, school district, special district, or any other political subdivision or governmental instrumentality of or within the State.

(c) If any part or parts of this section are challenged in state or federal court, the State shall defend the legality of this section until all appeals have been exhausted and a final judgment is enacted.

(d) This section shall be self-executing. If any part or parts of this section are found to be in conflict with federal law or the United States Constitution, the section shall be implemented to the maximum extent that federal law and the United States Constitution permit. Any provision held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.

(e) Any citizen residing in the state of California may sue for injunctive, declaratory, or any other appropriate relief to enjoin violations or to compel compliance with the provisions of this section. In any legal action to enforce subdivision (a), the burden shall be on the State to demonstrate that the benefits or services are required to be provided pursuant to federal law. The court shall award to a prevailing plaintiff or defendant, other than the State, the costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

(f) Any elected official or government official who willfully violates the provisions of this title may be held personally liable for the costs of litigation including reasonable attorney’s fees and actual damages.


11 posted on 10/11/2006 4:44:46 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

Considering that Prop 187 passed by a wide margin a decade ago and that things have only gotten worse (and more publicized since then), I think this has a good chance of passing as well.


14 posted on 10/11/2006 5:58:36 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
The back door has always been mixed households or family eligibility units. The introduction of anchor babies into the equation has always rendered traditional safeguards ineffectual.

This should be interesting. I'm not holding my breath until the US has the collective, national resolve to include anchor babies as part of routine, deportation orders.

16 posted on 10/11/2006 6:16:02 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson