[editor-surveyor]

Only about 2% of our DNA is even classified; where do they get their 98% similarities? 98% of 2% is still about 1.96%

So we have 1.96% in common with chimps.

[Coyoteman]

Wrong again ===> Placemarker <===

[RunningWolf]

Another thing, take any chemical process whether it is one that makes a more complex compound or one that breaks a compound down into the more and more simple ending up with the most basic of compounds and or elements. For example when you burn methane you end up with water & some Co2 etc. But Methane is not those elemental compound and those base elemental compounds are not methane.

Now apply this to the part physical and part bio mechanical extraction processes to produce 'dna'.

My point here is that substance they are seeing after the extraction process is only a facsimile of dna, not the real article that exists in a live cell.

W.

[driftdiver]

We have more in common with mice and pigs from a DNA perspective than we do with chimps.

[FreedomProtector]

Patterns of similarity among organisms, homology, or homogeneous structures, [homo: root prefix meaning "same"] are best explained via the same (common) Designer with the same (common/master) plan.


A captivating and interesting read for anyone on the subject is:

Denton, Michael, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Chapter 7
“The Failure of Homology.”


Homologies are are not similarities due to common ancestry which came to be by chance and natural process. Homologies are similarities due to a the same common Designer, the same common, single yet triune Ancestor--God.