[Star Traveler]

You said -- "what's the difference? isn't the content of the article that is the more important?"

It's by referencing links to verifiable sources (or even some source), as opposed to "vanity posts" that one is able to evaluate the veracity of claims made.

As it stands, I don't know if this poster made this up or made a vanity post, or is collecting information from a variety of sources, some trustworthy, some not.

So, in this case, it's more important to know the source in order to know if the content is correct or not.

Regards,
Star Traveler

[Cicero]

This article is from one of the pages on the website posted.

For a direct link, click here:

http://www.movementforabetteramerica.org/greathuecry.html

I don't know what your objection to the article is.

[Coleus]

have you ever read an article in a newspaper or posted on the FReerepublic from WND, NewsMax, National Review, etc.? Is their info. backed up by footnotes? No. It's a person giving a report, writing an article. So why is this article any different. We know that over 45 million surgical abortions were performed and know that depopulation is bad as we are now seeing in such countries in Japan, and a few in Europe.