Sherley said that the "tumor formation property is an inherent feature of the cells" and warned that the possibility of overcoming it is likely very far into the future. MIT is about as leftist as you can get, if they're jumping ship it should be obvious to all that embryonic stem cell research has no future.
1 posted on
10/10/2006 4:17:43 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; narses; 8mmMauser
2 posted on
10/10/2006 4:18:13 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
What??!!?? But John Edwards told me that if Kerry was elected people like Chris Reeve would walk again. See evil Bush has taken all the embryonic stem cells and hidden them away so that people have to suffer. The minute that these cells are made available to the poor scientists who want to help people, all the world's problems will be cured.
At least that's what I was told for the last six years.
3 posted on
10/10/2006 4:24:28 PM PDT by
mockingbyrd
(Good heavens! What women these Christians have-----Libanus)
To: wagglebee
the possibility of overcoming it is likely very far into the future.In other words, likely "nonexistent."
5 posted on
10/10/2006 4:30:09 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: wagglebee
"the possibility of overcoming it is likely very far into the future."
"if they're jumping ship it should be obvious to all that embryonic stem cell research has no future."
Non-sequitur at its biased worst. One thousand miles journey starts with the first step and continues with the next ones, but he who stops walking will never reach the goal. As long as there are smart people working on them, the things which are "likely very far into the future" become closer every day, like it was [and still is, 50 years later] with, for example, fusion reactors. Where would that field be if the work in it stopped after the first small tokamak?
7 posted on
10/10/2006 4:37:37 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
10 posted on
10/10/2006 4:49:34 PM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: wagglebee
"MIT is about as leftist as you can get, if they're jumping ship it should be obvious to all that embryonic stem cell research has no future."
That's one professor. Lotta others are still gung-ho.
Mrs VS
To: wagglebee
MIT is about as leftist as you can get It depends on the department. The finance department at the Sloan School, for instance (where I studied), leans right. There are quite a few right-leaning people in the economics department, too. Most people in the hard sciences lean left, but they tend to keep their politics seperate from their science. There's also a few prominent right-leaning guys hard scientists, like the atmospheric science prof who's a global warming skeptic.
The real problem is in the humanities departments; that's where Noam Chomsky is. Nearly everyone I knew in the finance and econ departments were embarassed that he and other "humanists" like him are affilated with the Institute.
To: wagglebee
Fascinating. I'd heard about the failures but I hadn't heard about the tumors. I'm very limited in biological science study, but I'm pretty logical. Could it be that the embryonic cells are faster replicating and out of synch with the more mature host?
23 posted on
10/10/2006 6:26:15 PM PDT by
jimfree
(Freep and ye shall find.)
To: wagglebee
Embryonic stem cell "research" in the European Union has less than 1 millions euros allocated annually for it. Even they know it's a blind alley.
To: wagglebee
But it's a position supported by the Pro-Life camp. Therefore it has to be fought against by the Pro-Death camp. Logic and evidence be damned.
28 posted on
10/10/2006 6:59:35 PM PDT by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: wagglebee
To all pro-lifers - not specifically wagglebee - please be cautious about LifeNews. Often Ertelt doesn't get the story right and mixes up stem cell methods.
BTW, left as as MIT is, Professor Sherley is no lefty ;-)
To: wagglebee
An MIT professor says that embryonic stem cell research is nowhere close to helping patients. That's because the US hasn't put 10% of its GNP into embryonic stem cell research, you heartless creep. /HEAVY sarcasm
For the Left, the more money one confiscates from others, the more compassionate one is. Concern over results is selfish.
31 posted on
10/10/2006 7:58:38 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
36 posted on
12/03/2006 9:24:22 PM PST by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
37 posted on
12/04/2006 11:09:34 AM PST by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: wagglebee
Embryonic stem cells would be tissue transplantation from another person. Adult stem cells use the patient's own DNA. Embryonic stem cells would have much greater regulation cost and litigation risk.
39 posted on
12/04/2006 3:06:40 PM PST by
Plutarch
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson