Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phantomworker
The chief causes of Airbus's failures are incompetence, infighting among management, poor design, poor planning, and major delays in development.

I can't understand how they could have not standardized their software prior to starting the A380 program. Multiple software versions on their most important design package were a disaster waiting to happen. I'm deferring several software upgrades right now to avoid compatibility problems till after the company I work for finishes a current project.

57 posted on 10/10/2006 5:42:09 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

I don't understand the logic too well either. Somewhere I read that they just didn't like that Dassault (who makes CATIA) was also an aviation competitor?

Is it a management flaw? Is it compatibility issues as in your case? Some software is backward compatible and some are not. Did you say you work on CATIA or AutoCad?

I wonder if some of Airbus's problems aren't due to their stubbornness or some French socialist culture fear of saving face. (I'd glad to be a capitalist, lol).


58 posted on 10/10/2006 6:02:46 PM PDT by phantomworker (A life spent in making mistakes is more honorable & more useful than a life spent in doing nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson