I will also stand by my claim that to define a human, created "in God's image," merely by physical existence is at the very least materialistic, demeaning to God, and potentially on the slippery slope to atheism. For if a human is defined by physical existence, what need is there to assume the existence of soul?
That's the sad and brutal irony of your position.
I will also stand by my claim that to define a human, created "in God's image," merely by physical existence is at the very least materialistic, demeaning to God, and potentially on the slippery slope to atheism.
So stop doing it.