Microsoft is famous for using their name and the "process" to give people the illusion that Microsoft is going to make things happen for them. Most especially technology companies that Microsoft pilfers via the mechanism of "Due Diligence." Where MS says they are attempting to find it the company's technology is "real." If its not protected well enough, MS simply implements their own and says ... sue us! Many have tried and few have succeeded. But, during the period of inspection or communication Microsoft is getting their way.
Such is probably the case with BayStar where just the Name of Microsoft and sweet promises were enough for BayStar to risk $50 Million on the opportunity to be owed a favor by Microsoft.
Whoa! With all due respect, that is just not true. I have been in the industry for quite some time and I know that many companies are "leery" about doing business with Microsoft. Microsoft has a long track record of eventually turning on those who partner with it.
That is why I cannot believe that BayStar said "Microsoft would make it worth our while" yet have nothing to back it up with. At least, nothing they are willing to come out and admit to in public.