Militants Kill Missionary Couple's 2 Children Who Refused To Convert To Islam

Special Correspondent for ASSIST News Service in Pakistan ^ | Sheraz Khurram Khan

[Northern Yankee]

No problem there good buddy.

Thought I was losing my mind... course... maybe I have and just don't know it. ; )

[American in Israel]

Actually, missionary work is to go live with the people that you are bringing the gospel to. How will they know you except by your love for one another. It is not about handing out bibles, it is about being a bible.

This you cannot do on the sly. My primary point in this discussion is that do not judge them as child endangers, as they have raised their children far better than most Americans. Do not judge them as careless, as they care far more than most. And do not think them as foolish, they are the ones fighting the Islamic scourge in the only way that is truly effective.

As for those who think they are responsible to their children staying home and letting this one couple fight the war, the war is coming to them and they are doing nothing about it. They are not responsible, they are selfish. This couple is not selfish, it is selfless.

In short, in my eyes, this couple is the high standard we will all be compared to, how much of a shame it is when they are surrounded by others in the moment of their sorrow and subjected to shallow judgment and mocking.

They are hero's, who fell in battle fighting so that we can be free.

[semaj]

Ahem, any culpability for these atrocious crimes lies at the feet of the Isamofacist. Pull your heads out, and stop making excuses for these monsters.

[American in Israel]

While I am sure they were quite aware of the danger when they moved to Pakistan, I think staying home and doing nothing about the Islamic horde as they invade the country is far more selfish than what they did.

Most Americans are letting the other guy take care of it, and living for themselves. It is not humorious to see those who do not go, and do not send, mock the price those who go pay to accomplish what we are all called to do.

To see them called selfish, when they are the primary example of selflessness is the pinacle of Ugly Americanism.

[Burkean]

It's not excuse, but it's obvious the parents put their children at risk by taking them into such a dangerous region. There are many things a parent can do to make life safer for their children, and on the top of my list is not taking them to live amongst islamofacist monsters.

[Lucky9teen]

I never once excused these monsters for the crimes they committed, not once and won't ever. They truly are to blame for what happened.

However, I happen to agree that parents shouldn't take their children to such savage places, no matter the reason.

[MEGoody]

You speak for God?

In a manner of speaking. Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of scripture knows that what I have said is true.

[mugs99]

In a manner of speaking. Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of scripture knows that what I have said is true.
Jeremiah 14:14
.

[mugs99]

they are the ones fighting the Islamic scourge in the only way that is truly effective.

Nonsense. It has never been effective. Have you forgotten the Children's Crusades? Thousands of kids sent to convert the Muslims. All of them ended up slaves or dead. You zealots are a danger to children!
.

[American in Israel]

I think the guys that killed the children are a far worse danger to children than the ones that try to stop them.

But you atheists would not agree, because you zealously blame everything on those who have faith in something. If a woman is raped, its is because the dress she wore. A child is killed, the parent should not have had them there. All so you do not have to face the fact that the perp is not the victim, for you fear to set the blame on those who do the deed. Tends to come to close to the lusts raging in your heart, and the responsibility that is inherent with that. If you look in the mirror, you will see someone who will fit well in a society that makes women wear burkas, all so she will not be raped, yet does not blame the men who rape women.

[Bellflower]

Should people with children move out of the USA? The islamofacist monsters hate us and are constantly threatening us. They have called all Muslims out of this country because they claim they are planning vast destruction here. They have told Muslims if they stay they are not responsible for their being harmed during the attacks that they are planning. I hope they are just blowing prideful smoke but do we know?

[Burkean]

I do think people with children should avoid moving with their families to Muslim countries that are hostile to non-Muslim religions and engaging the family in what the article describes as an "underground" mission. The fact that it has to be underground should have been a major red flag.

[mugs99]

I think the guys that killed the children are a far worse danger to children than the ones that try to stop them.
Hollow words from one who supports sending children out to die for the cause.

But you atheists would not agree
I'm not an Atheist but you Satanists would not agree.

If a woman is raped, its is because the dress she wore. A child is killed, the parent should not have had them there. All so you do not have to face the fact that the perp is not the victim, for you fear to set the blame on those who do the deed.
Straw man. You can't defend your position. I have not defended the killers. You have. When you send children to be murdered to save the souls of the killers you are doing just that. You are practicing human sacrifice that benefits not the children sacrificed, but the killers who will receive a reward in their heaven.

If you look in the mirror, you will see someone who will fit well in a society that makes women wear burkas, all so she will not be raped, yet does not blame the men who rape women.
When I look in the mirror I see a man who supports life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for men, women and children. Revealed Religion puts women in burkas and sends children out to die for the cause.
.

[American in Israel]

Hollow words from one who supports sending children out to die for the cause.

How disgusting can you get. To take this family that was kidnapped by terrorists and turn that into "sending their children out to die for the cause".

Have you no shame? Or is winning an argument worth any low-down debased methodology to you? I have a hint for you, you do not win an argument by cutting your opponent down, but by showing that your point is superior. To make up disgusting ideas and sign their idea over to who you argue with is little more than mental masturbation with degradation.

These people no more sent their children out to die than you are for freedom. You are nothing but an anti-religious fascist seeking every excuse to attack religion that you can generate. You are a short step from killing people for their faith, simply because you have none. My bet is you find yourself being that very religous zelot you hate within 10 years, self justified in killing others because they do not agree with you.

[mugs99]

You are nothing but an anti-religious fascist seeking every excuse to attack religion that you can generate. You are a short step from killing people for their faith, simply because you have none. My bet is you find yourself being that very religous zelot you hate within 10 years, self justified in killing others because they do not agree with you.

ROTFLMAO!!!
Thanks for making my point! You can't defend your position so all you have is personal attack and fabrication. I'll put my religious faith ahead of your child endangering fascist dogma anytime.
.

[MEGoody]

Glad to see you admit your posts have been in error.

[mugs99]

Glad to see you admit your posts have been in error
I don't speak for God...or claim to.
.

[MEGoody]

I don't speak for God...or claim to.

That's good because what you've said in this thread is far off the mark. But at least I see you are picking up and reading His word occassionally. Maybe when you learn it, you'll be able to speak it.

[mugs99]

That's good because what you've said in this thread is far off the mark. But at least I see you are picking up and reading His word occassionally. Maybe when you learn it, you'll be able to speak it.

I think I've probably read more of "His" word than you.
I'm not limited to the King James Bible, compiled in 1611.
.

[MEGoody]

I think I've probably read more of "His" word than you.

Just curious what you think is 'God's word' besides the bible.

I'm not limited to the King James Bible, compiled in 1611.

And?