Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: SK Intelligence, "Unusual movements at Pung-gye-ri"(another possible nuke test)
Yonhap News (via Naver.com) ^ | 10/09/06 | Kim Nam-kwon, Lee Seung-woo

Posted on 10/09/2006 5:00:56 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

S. Korean Intelligence, "Unusual movements at Pung-gye-ri, too"

[Yonhap News 2006-10-09 19:15]

Head of S. Korean Intelligence, "Additional nuclear tests are certainly possible"

(Seoul = Yonhap News) Kim Nam-kwon, Lee Seung-woo = S. Korean government is busy analyzing signs of unusual movements in the afternoon of Oct. 9 at Pung-gye-ri, Gilju County, a different place from Munsudan-ri, Hwadae County, N. Hamkyong Province, where today's nuclear test occurred.

Kim Seung-kyu, Head of S. Korean Intelligence, attended the full session of Intelligence Committee of National Assembly this afternoon. When someone asked, "Have you pinpointed the N. Korean nuclear test site?" he added this information, while giving his answer.

He said, "Starting at 3pm this afternoon, we spotted unusual movements at Pung-gye-ri, where we first thought the test would be conducted. They are movements of 30~40 personnels and vehicles. We are looking into it carefully," according to a member of the Committee.

Mr. Kim went on, "We try to figure out if they plan to do a series of tests as India and Pakistan did."

Another member of the Committee said that Mr. Kim reported, "There is ample possibility that N. Korea would conduct additional nuclear tests."

According to the member, S. Korean Intelligence estimates that the nuclear bomb which went off today is a subcritical bomb whose yield is less than 1 kt.

/end my translation



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nkorea; northkorea; nucleartest; punggyeri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
Here we go, another one.
1 posted on 10/09/2006 5:00:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Thanks for the post.

I heard speculation about this last night.


2 posted on 10/09/2006 5:01:42 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 10/09/2006 5:02:09 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

would not suprise me, the message here is they have a 'lot' of them and want us to think so...


4 posted on 10/09/2006 5:02:12 AM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Interesting


5 posted on 10/09/2006 5:03:19 AM PDT by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Shaping up to be a busy day.


6 posted on 10/09/2006 5:03:40 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

For this one... they'll want to see if it works below the 38th Parallel.


7 posted on 10/09/2006 5:04:35 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hmmmmm..well, well...busy fellow.

If they do another one, they are ASKING for BIG trouble..


8 posted on 10/09/2006 5:05:36 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I didn't think they would do another so fast. If they do, then it's for effect and has nothing to do with real testing.


9 posted on 10/09/2006 5:05:40 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irishguy
the message here is they have a 'lot' of them and want us to think so...

It worked for a while when the Soviets did it in the 50's.

10 posted on 10/09/2006 5:07:33 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Dancing through life like a street mime with tourettes syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

A second one would be for China's benefit --- China is the one supporting Kim and his regime.


11 posted on 10/09/2006 5:07:37 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Re #9

Yep, they want to show us that they have a super duper triple over-easy big stuff.:)

12 posted on 10/09/2006 5:08:40 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Can someone more informed than me tell me where they are getting the fuel? I thought I'd read there are no natural sources in that country, so all sources are external.(?)

If they have a finite amount, I say let them set off fireworks, provided we can prevent them from getting more.

I am aware that, using the residual explosion by-products, we have the ability to tell what fuel and from where it came, true?


13 posted on 10/09/2006 5:09:02 AM PDT by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
If the yield is much higher or lower then it could well be "legitimate" test of a differently configured weapon.
14 posted on 10/09/2006 5:09:12 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Exactly...but I'm thinking China may start to get a bit PO'ed...this is not doing them any good either...Japan and S Korea will decide to go nuke too...


15 posted on 10/09/2006 5:09:26 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
According to the member, S. Korean Intelligence estimates that the nuclear bomb which went off today is a subcritical bomb whose yield is less than 1 kt.

What is a subcritical bomb? This confusalated me with high degrees of unknowingness.
16 posted on 10/09/2006 5:10:20 AM PDT by class8601_nuke (don't just be critical, be prompt critical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Agreed. I'm beginning to think the ChiComms may have lost control.
17 posted on 10/09/2006 5:11:23 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Kim has embarrassed China. I hope the Chinese see it that way.


18 posted on 10/09/2006 5:12:09 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
Re #13

They harvest enough plutonium from spent fuel rod from their nuclear reactors. They also have good-size uranium mine. However, harvesting weapon's grade uranium is slow and time-consuming process, according to what I know.

19 posted on 10/09/2006 5:12:28 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Re #18

China's Hamlet moment:

Who do I hate more, N. Korea or U.S.?

This has been a really difficult question to answer until today, as far as China is concerned.

20 posted on 10/09/2006 5:14:41 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson