Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earlier: Rumsfeld says North Korea nuke test would signal international failure
Herald Today and Associated Press ^ | October 9, 2006

Posted on 10/09/2006 12:26:47 AM PDT by bd476

Earlier: Rumsfeld says North Korea nuke test would signal international failure



ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Thursday if North Korea successfully tests a nuclear weapon, it will show weakness on the part of the international community.

‘‘And that failure ... is something that the international community would have to register and ask itself how comfortable are we being that ineffective in this situation,’’ Rumsfeld told reporters at the Pentagon during a visit by Croatian Defense Minister Berislav Roncevic.

His comments came as U.S. officials warned North Korea anew not to test a nuclear weapon.

‘‘It isn’t in their interest and it isn’t in anyone’s interest,’’ Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill, the top U.S. negotiator on the communist country’s nuclear program, told AP Television. ‘‘We will not accept a nuclear state.’’

Rumsfeld also said that a successful North Korean test could prompt other countries to pursue nuclear weapons.

‘‘Because of the ineffectiveness, and the lack of cohesion and the inability to marshal sufficient leverage to prevent North Korea from proceeding toward a nuclear program ... it will kind of lower the threshold, and other countries will step forward with it,’’ Rumsfeld said.

He added that depending on whether the test is above or below ground, the United States has as good a capability of detecting it as any country. But he declined to say whether or not it would trigger any U.S. military action.

‘‘I wouldn’t be the person who would make a decision like that. That’s a decision for the country, and a decision for president,’’ Rumsfeld said.

The United States has sent a message of ‘‘deep concern’’ to the North through diplomatic channels at the United Nations in New York, Hill said Wednesday, adding that the North Koreans had received it and had not yet responded.

The North Korean announcement gave no date for any test, but U.S. intelligence agencies are keeping close watch over activity at possible test sites in the North, even while cautioning against reading too much into every movement.

The United States and North Korea have no diplomatic relations outside deadlocked six-nation nuclear talks and rarely communicate with each other so directly.

Hill would not discuss policy options, but he said senior U.S. diplomats, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, were in steady communication with their counterparts in Asia and Europe.

In the event of a nuclear test, Hill said, ‘‘We would have no choice but to act and act resolutely to make sure (North Korea) understood, and make sure every other country in the world understands, that this is a very bad mistake.’’

U.S. and international officials also said the U.N. Security Council would consider sanctions against the North if the test occurs.

A U.S. intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the highly sensitive situation with North Korea, said the United States is now seeing the movement of people, materials and vehicles and other activity around one possible test site. But, the official said, it could be similar to activity seen a couple of months ago. No test occurred then.

The United States has spy satellites and other eavesdropping equipment aimed at North Korea, including ground-based seismic sensors.

While North Korean leader Kim Jong Il may decide to hold the test, it cannot be ruled out that Tuesday’s threat was saber-rattling, an effort to force a change in stalled nuclear negotiations or some other motivating factor.

———

Associated Press writers Barry Schweid, Katherine Shrader and Foster Klug contributed to this report.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: kimiljung; nuclear; rumsfeld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2006 12:26:48 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bd476

Really, really not good.


2 posted on 10/09/2006 12:28:31 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476

You are finding all the good stuff.

People still don't get it that there are evil nuts in this world, who only understand force and negotiations with them only emboldens them.

The time for sanctions was in 1994, and military action a year later, if NK didn't comply, instead the Clinton administration gave NK nukes.



Timeline: North Korea's nuclear weapons program

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1716096/posts


_1993: North Korea shocks world by saying it will quit Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, later suspends its withdrawal.

_1994: North Korea, United States sign agreement in Geneva, North pledges to freeze, eventually dismantle, nuclear weapons program in exchange for help building two power-producing nuclear reactors.

_Sept. 17, 1999: U.S. President Bill Clinton agrees to first major easing of economic sanctions against North Korea since Korean War's end in 1953.

_July 2000: North Korea threatens to restart nuclear program if Washington does not compensate for loss of electricity due to delays in building nuclear power plants.


3 posted on 10/09/2006 12:34:08 AM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
No, it really isn't good news at all. Thank you for the link, B-Chan.

4 posted on 10/09/2006 12:38:18 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"_Sept. 17, 1999: U.S. President Bill Clinton agrees to first major easing of economic sanctions against North Korea since Korean War's end in 1953."


Clinton was almost as tough on DPRK as he was on Al Qaeda. Hope no "right wingers" a ABC make a docudrama about this. Then Americans may begin to see what a lousy President he really was.
5 posted on 10/09/2006 12:39:08 AM PDT by Alfonso1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Everyone at FR is good at finding info. Still, that's quite a compliment, F.O. Thanks. :-)

Thank you for supplying the background information, the link to the thread and the time line!

6 posted on 10/09/2006 12:40:09 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bd476
The day that Blix was to give his speech before the UN about Saddam's WMD's bjclinton said that all N.Korea wanted was respect. So I guess in Clinton's world N.Korea is now respectable.
7 posted on 10/09/2006 12:43:33 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476
‘‘And that failure ... is something that the international community would have to register and ask itself how comfortable are we being that ineffective in this situation,’’

I guess talking and gifts didn't work. Heck, aren't the South Koreans still shipping rice to the KoreaComs?

yitbos

8 posted on 10/09/2006 12:45:12 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. " - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts; FairOpinion; bruinbirdman; B-Chan; Cindy; Lancey Howard; AmericanInTokyo; ...
International Sign of Respect
North Korea Style




A North Korean soldier gestures from a ship on the Yalu River at Dandong, on China's border with North Korea Monday Oct. 9, 2006. (AP / Greg Baker)

9 posted on 10/09/2006 12:55:10 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bd476
never mind that. Get into the souvenir business while they last.
10 posted on 10/09/2006 12:56:39 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bd476

I bet they're hungry... :)


11 posted on 10/09/2006 12:58:19 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
LOL!

12 posted on 10/09/2006 1:00:23 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bd476

That ship looks like is suffers from dry rot wonder what is keeping the windows in place?


13 posted on 10/09/2006 1:00:40 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Riiiight. ;-)

14 posted on 10/09/2006 1:00:51 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Just mythoughts wrote: "That ship looks like is suffers from dry rot wonder what is keeping the windows in place?"
Hmm, let me think...


15 posted on 10/09/2006 1:07:17 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bd476
Just think our Clintons would have given them brand new ships if they had ask.
16 posted on 10/09/2006 1:15:14 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Ohmigawd...the Eurowussies aren't gonna like Rummie calling them "ineffective"...


17 posted on 10/09/2006 2:20:09 AM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
wastoute wrote: " 'Ohmigawd...the Eurowussies aren't gonna like Rummie calling them "ineffective'..."

No, but they have undoubtedly become quite accustomed to hearing it. Along the lines of "if the shoe fits" and all that...


Trio Sings "Itsy Bitsy Spider" in 3 part harmony

18 posted on 10/09/2006 2:57:54 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bd476

One of them had to be thrown out of power, literally! Germany said "Auf wiedersehen" to Der Steuer Meister Schroeder.

Chirac's definitely out next year. It will be Center-right Sarkozy, Le Pen with an outside chance if the vieux con still wants to run.

Putin retires next year as well with elections scheduled. The world starts to look better already, no?


19 posted on 10/09/2006 3:55:46 AM PDT by MimirsWell (Musharraf - In the line of (back)fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bd476

And again, Rummy would be correct. The International community IS a failure, a total and complete failure.


20 posted on 10/09/2006 4:15:42 AM PDT by bpjam (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson