Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ark_girl
"This is NOT a time to let them come in, kill the economy, cut military funding, and cripple our President. This is what we all know their agenda basically is."

You are correct about the Democrats being soft on the military and being big spenders, but Bush has spent more than Clinton did, and the Repubs have held all the power for years now, and have done nothing about the NK and Iranian nuclear programs but talk. So the question becomes, how many years does the GOP have to control the WH, Senate and Congress before people begin to understand that they haven't done anything about these renegade nations' nuclear programs either? America lacks strong leadership in this crucial period in history, that's pretty clear.

153 posted on 10/08/2006 9:25:06 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: TheCrusader

I agree to a point, but as bad as our guys have been, the Dems would be worse. They're all worthless, but I'm not convinced they're all EQUALLY worthless yet. Do you HONESTLY thing putting Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi in charge of things would help this situation? They'll spend the next two years trying to impeach Bush for stealing Girl Scout cookies or paying the gardener too much, meanwhile Kim Jong and Iran will be loading up on nukes.

I agree with you, though. I'm disgusted with OUR guys too at this point. I'm just scared of the Dems. No point in jumping from the frying pan into the fire.

What's depressing is that I'm not greatly comforted by our '08 candidates either. Depressing... Why can't we find another Ronald Reagan?


180 posted on 10/08/2006 9:40:04 PM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson