Skip to comments.
Rep. Kolbe saw Foley messages in 2000
Washington Post ^
| 11-9-06
| Jonathon Weisman
Posted on 10/08/2006 7:37:23 PM PDT by dogbyte12
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker
Kolbe cant have his gay military wedding, now.
Awwww.
To: dogbyte12
Just imagine what would have happened if they had made Foley resign then. "Homophobic" would then be the libs cry. And besides, skanky emails are not illegal.
I heard some callers on Drudge tonight. "I would NEVER vote democratic. They think this would change my vote??? Hahaha, THEY are the party with absolutely NO morals." it was great.
62
posted on
10/08/2006 10:26:17 PM PDT
by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: dogbyte12
They were not being abused. They were getting sex emails. They were going to FIRE him for being gay? When his district elected him? Hastert is not his boss, he works for the people of his district in Florida.
this is nothing...
63
posted on
10/08/2006 10:29:04 PM PDT
by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: axes_of_weezles
64
posted on
10/08/2006 10:37:52 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Our troops will send all of the worlds terrorists to hell in a handbasket with no virgins!)
To: conservative in nyc
You can download another PDF (6 meg) of those Congressional Record pages
here (and burn some of
CREW's bandwidth in the process).
65
posted on
10/08/2006 10:54:47 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: AmishDude
And if a creepy gay guy is sending you creepy messages, why would your first step be to the other gay Republican Congressman? To see if you can get even creepier messages?
To: SandRat
Kolbe was gay first, Republican second. And I'm not so sure the Republican is even second anymore.
67
posted on
10/08/2006 11:00:06 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: dogbyte12
This story is so four hours ago...
68
posted on
10/08/2006 11:03:55 PM PDT
by
streetpreacher
(What if you're wrong?)
To: jveritas
Read the story -- Kolbe knew six years ago. Hasert and the GOP leadership knew about the "overfriendly" emails months ago. Anyone with any integrity or character would have done an internal investigation on Foley.
And, anyone thinking Foley's sexual attraction to young male pages was confined to emails is naive or willingly-blind fool. If he was lusting after male pages in emails, his desire for these pages had to be apparently while he was around them for his co-workers to notice.
To: ladyinred
This is politically driven publicity, and there are many more important issues now I disagree. From a conservative perspective, there isn't anything more important than reshaping the GOP and its leadership into one that is focused on promoting and defending conservative principles rather than one that will sell out conservatism in order to maintain power.
That is only going to be possible if RINO, liberal and backstabbing Republicans are removed from office.
To: Ol' Sparky
71
posted on
10/09/2006 12:25:02 AM PDT
by
colors
(JUST SAY IT)
To: dogbyte12
Repeat this often:
1. There are *no* emails from Foley to the 16 y.o.
2. There are *no* forwarded emails from Foley to the 16 y.o.
72
posted on
10/09/2006 12:25:17 AM PDT
by
ARW3A
To: cynwoody
You can download another PDF (6 meg) of those Congressional Record pages here (and burn some of CREW's bandwidth in the process).
Burning CREW's bandwith? An even better idea! They're missing Studds' floor statement, though.
To: SuzyQue
Are we talking about the "overly friendly" emails, or the graphic text messages? These are ones we hadn't heard about. The "overly friendly" ones we know about came from 2005, and the more graphic IMs were from 2003.
74
posted on
10/09/2006 1:29:13 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: dogbyte12
Kolbe (GAY), says that his Page (GAY), received inappropriate e-mails from Foley (GAY). Hmmm. I'm starting to get the feeling that there may be a connections here. Can someone help me out?
75
posted on
10/09/2006 3:24:23 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism in a parasite that ALWAYS kills its host.)
To: dogbyte12
Aaaaaarg! Why are we allowing them to make this about "Who knew?" and "When?". No one ever pulls that ploy on them!
To: martinidon
Wow...how long you been a Dem? Wonder how many people knew about Clintons rapes and affairs and kept it to themselves? Perhaps Hillary did...and she's running for Prez? I see blatant double standard.
PS....emails are not sex.
77
posted on
10/09/2006 4:28:27 AM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
To: SuzyQue
"Uncomfortable" is the clue. It's like "quagmire". It means nothing without knowing the intention of the writer AND the history of the receiver.
Here's an example: If someone wrote Marilyn Monroe saying: "Heard you have a great set of legs". Interpret that any way you want. "Uncomfortable" could be one of those choices.
Now add "Looking forward to see you again". JFK
78
posted on
10/09/2006 4:45:12 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: dogbyte12
"Period. We are in this mess now because of him.""WE' are in no such thing. But I take note that YOU are constantly trying to gin up this story. Every day.
79
posted on
10/09/2006 4:50:53 AM PDT
by
A Citizen Reporter
("And you got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever!")
To: PghBaldy
Turn out is everything this November.
80
posted on
10/09/2006 5:31:56 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson