Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: layman
I only read this far and stopped because it occurred to me that if our constitution provides vital protection to criminals, then WTF? I think the founding fathers intended vital protection for law abiding citizens but not for criminals.

The Fourth Amendment protections apply to all free persons. Honoring the Fourth Amendment will sometimes increase the difficulty of catching crooks, but it will seldom pose an insurmountable obstacle to enforcement of reasonable laws. Unfortunately, the War on Drugs has been used to shred the Fourth Amendment almost beyond recognition.

13 posted on 10/08/2006 4:39:20 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
The Fourth Amendment protections apply to all free persons.

Agreed, but what exactly are 'vital protections to criminals'? Is it a game where there are fair and unfair ways to catch mass murderers? 'Vital protections to suspected criminals' makes sense to me, but 'vital protections' to criminals does not. I think I might be splitting hairs here.

21 posted on 10/08/2006 5:00:21 PM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson