Skip to comments.
President touts alien citizenship
The Washington Times ^
| October 7, 2006
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 10/08/2006 10:11:25 AM PDT by EveningStar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: basil
All the more reason not to expect really stupid statements like the headline of this article!
You'd think that he could get this one right!
41
posted on
10/08/2006 11:05:28 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: EveningStar
Is he actively working to destroy GOP chances this fall?
Whose side is he on?
42
posted on
10/08/2006 11:06:47 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Mini-14
You hit the nail on the head.
I, too, will support the Pubs with my checkbook and may even volunteer to do some work.
But it's getting harder to adjust the noseclip.
43
posted on
10/08/2006 11:06:59 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
(Charles Martel: past and future of France)
To: EveningStar
I can't understand why people want to come here. We're the epitome of all that's bad. We're told that every day.
44
posted on
10/08/2006 11:07:35 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: EveningStar
That will surely rally the base, NOT!
45
posted on
10/08/2006 11:10:45 AM PDT
by
38special
(I mean come'on.)
To: US Navy guy
This kind of political accumen 30 day before the election needs to be quelled. Rove needs to collar him.
To: Redbob
Whose side is he on? Who? The space alien in the photo? I sure hope he's on our side!
To: EveningStar
To: basil
Just as the Foley thing is dying down, GWB has to beat another asinine drum to hand control of congress to the Democrats. Does he think two years of their control will wake the sheeple up enough to keep the White House Republican two years from now?
Here in Pennsylvania, Bob Casey is already running ads against Santorum as soft on legal immigration. He believes all he has to do to win is duck debates for the next four weeks and run out the clock.
As for pointing out that we have 200,000 Hispanics in uniform, I don't hear any objections to puting them (what few are not already citizems) on a path to citizenship. They've done something to earn it! As with most other Americans, I'd even be willing to discuss amnesty or path to citizenship for some of the 12 million illegals IF we could see some enforcement on deporting gang bangers, criminals, government teat suckers and reconquistadoras.
49
posted on
10/08/2006 11:17:22 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Mini-14
"Bush is hell-bent on a mission to destroy the Republican party and this country with his support for the Mexican invasion, so he will get his just desserts if the Democrats take over Congress -- an impeachment. I won't be sorry one bit if the Democrats impeach him."
In the unlikely case of the Democrats taking over Congress, there will be no impeachment, despite all the hand-wringing over it. What would be the point?
Bush will be the ultimate lame-duck President, and he already goes along with most of the things the Democrats want to do, with the notable exception of fetal embryonic stem cell research.
Bush is a globalist. He doesn't mind spending lots of money on stuff, and he hates vetoing bills. The democrats will just send over their bills, and Bush will sign them, just like he has done all along.
Nothing will change.
50
posted on
10/08/2006 11:18:59 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: EveningStar
This is perverted. If true, either he is bought off/blackmailed or he is having a mental breakdown.
51
posted on
10/08/2006 11:19:17 AM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Vigilanteman
As for pointing out that we have 200,000 Hispanics in uniform, I don't hear any objections to puting them (what few are not already citizems) on a path to citizenship. They've done something to earn it! As with most other Americans, I'd even be willing to discuss amnesty or path to citizenship for some of the 12 million illegals IF we could see some enforcement on deporting gang bangers, criminals, government teat suckers and reconquistadoras.I agree with you 100% . What do you think would be the best way to keep tabs?
52
posted on
10/08/2006 11:22:18 AM PDT
by
1035rep
To: Vigilanteman
Maybe he needs a dem senate and congress to get what he wants -- make illegals here into citizens (and I say that with very little sarcasm -- I don't think it will get through a GOP congress/senate).
To: Dante3
I think he's just concerned about the space alien.
To: Texas Songwriter
"Rove needs to collar him.
"
And how do you suppose Rove is going to do such a thing? Rove is not the POTUS. Bush is. He's not required to listen to Rove, and has not been listening to Rove, by all appearances. He's stopped listening to Cheney pretty much, as well.
Aside from the war, Bush has been on the side of most liberal measures. He announced his globalism during the 2000 campaign, along with his support for immigrants, legal or illegal.
He doesn't mind spending money, either. Remember those Social Security changes? What happened to them. You haven't heard Bush say a word about them lately.
Aside from the war, President Bush could put a (D) after his name and nobody would be able to tell the difference, in my opinion.
55
posted on
10/08/2006 11:23:22 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: theFIRMbss
There's something fishy about that picture.
To: MineralMan
Sure, I just love those new liberal judges he appointed to the SCOTUS.
57
posted on
10/08/2006 11:25:44 AM PDT
by
1035rep
To: isthisnickcool
Post maps on how to get to his ranch and say theres free everything waiting for them there. If he wants them so bad let him employ them and catch their diseases. I think its sad we have a president who refuses to see what the people of his country want for the most part. He would rather cater to Mexico and Mexicans. Build the wall and toss the illegals back to Mexico. It can be done if we work at it.
58
posted on
10/08/2006 11:26:21 AM PDT
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: 1035rep
"Sure, I just love those new liberal judges he appointed to the SCOTUS.
"
There haven't been enough rulings yet that demonstrate how far to the right those judges will stand. When the first Roe v. Wade challenge appears, we'll see. When the first real 2nd Amendment case comes before the SCOTUS, we'll see.
I've been watching the SCOTUS. So far, there hasn't been all that much change in their rulings.
59
posted on
10/08/2006 11:29:51 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: MineralMan
Aside from the war, President Bush could put a (D) after his name and nobody would be able to tell the difference, in my opinion.You would perhaps have preferred Mr.Kerry?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson