To: ruiner
Nuclear devices of quite low power can be made. An high explosive deep ground burst in hard rock that would appear very much like a fractional kiloton nuclear device is not even very expensive if one has an appropriate unused deep rock mine shaft. I suspect that two or three thousand tons of conventional modern mining explosives costing a few million dollars would be hard to distinguish from a Hiroshima type bomb when fired 6,000 feet down if the charge were well tamped and constrained by a concrete filled access tunnel.
Kim Jong Il might enjoy such a jest. He could even release a video covering the building of such a device (for "peaceful mining purposes", naturally) and then set off his nuke instead.
34 posted on
10/08/2006 10:06:34 AM PDT by
Iris7
(Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
To: Iris7
I'd be willing to bet there are subtle difference between seismic profiles of underground nuclear blasts (even small ones) and underground high explosives detonations of similar yield.
Anyone know for sure?
39 posted on
10/08/2006 10:43:22 AM PDT by
ruiner
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson