No, we don't want those people there. However, when you have people like George Soros paying private detectives to look for dirt on every person on our side and no widely-read MSM Publication taking a look at the other side -- or reporting it when a scandal does appear, then it's very lopsided and that is what I resent. Why isn't the NYTimes talking about Pelosi refusing to testify about what she knew and when she knew it in the Foley scandal? Did she knowingly hold back information about a potential pediphile for political one-ups-man-ship? If so, that is as important as what Hastert knew and when he knew it. They should be asking why Pelosi doesn't want Louis Freeh to do an independent investigation?
When the FBI went after William Jefferson of LA who defended him -- Hastert! We don't get the same treatment from the left side of the aisle.