Foley's constituents EMBRACED him.
Right...and, unless you didn't know he was gay..and would NEVER vote for a gay person, regardless of his/her behaviour...from what I have read in samantha's posts..he was a GOOD representative..as far as doing his job for his constituents...
Therefore, why NOT vote for him...IF this was unknown, or even if some of this is lies.
I have a feeling that enough of it is true to be a GOOD thing that he is gone...but, I also think a lot was lies, and is adding more, and more lies...not because of Foley, but because of the election.
ALL of the sources except Fordham seem to be anonymous...TOO convenient.
<snip>
Duh, my spelling is not embraceable.
Foley's constituents EMBRACED him.
It's worse than you think. I read the first statement as "they embarrassed him" and I thought huh? I mean.... well... um... huh?
Samantha's take on this, since he has been her congressman, has been instructive and refreshing. More importantly it gives me lots of confidence that the DBM is reading this race, which they now predict as a slam dunk for the dims, as badly as they are reading all of the other races.
I still think we're going to pick up seats in both the House and the Senate. I hope Chafee is gone, but I bet we don't lose another Senate seat, and I'm betting we get a different RINO in exchange for Chafee by picking up the seat in New Jersey. And if the folks in Florida get pissed enough might it put Katherine Harris over the top? Wouldn't that just mess with their heads? On both sides of the aisle?