Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgan in Denver

The Republican was Jack Kingston - I've always liked him.
He's the one that initiated and sent the letter to Pelosi re appearing under oath. I'll look for the thread


317 posted on 10/08/2006 8:40:40 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: Seattle Conservative; Morgan in Denver

Here's the thread:

House Republicans Wants Democrats to Appear Before Ethics Committee
Human Events ^ | 10-06-2006 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 10/06/2006 11:57:43 AM PDT by 300magnum

Eleven House Republicans on Thursday told Democratic leaders they want them to appear before the House Ethics Committee to answer questions about what they may have known -- and failed to disclose -- about former Rep. Mark Foley's communications with congressional pages.

Led by Rep. Jack Kingston (Ga.), vice chairman of the House Republican Conference, the group sent letters to Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) and Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean. The Republicans say Democrats shouldn't be absolved from answering questions about the scandal, especially in light of suspicions that the crisis was orchestrated as a political move to harm Republicans.

Just as it must be determined whether any Republican Members or political operatives were aware of and attempted to conceal Mr. Foley’s activities, it must also be determined whether any Democrat Members or political operatives were aware of, and attempted to conceal these same activities.

Therefore, we respectfully ask that you appear, under oath, before the House Ethics Committee.

In addition to Kingston, signatories include Representatives Kay Granger (Tex.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), Bill Shuster (Pa.), Lee Terry (Neb.), Tom Price (Ga.), Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Joe Wilson (S.C.), Lynn Westmoreland (Ga.), Roger Wicker (Miss.) and John Shadegg (Ariz.).

In a statement sent to bloggers late Thursday afternoon, Kingston said the following:

This sad episode should not be a partisan issue. It reflects poorly on the Congress as a whole and weakens the trust of the American people. In order to restore that trust we must complete this investigation in a thorough and non-partisan fashion. All Members of the House, our staff, and members of the public regardless of political party should come forward and provide whatever information they know. We need to get to the bottom of who knew about Mr. Foley's inexcusable actions, when did they know about it, when did they first become aware of the Instant Messages in question, and what did they do with that information. As Republicans we expect, and so far have seen, nothing less from our Leaders and today we are asking for the same full cooperation from Democratic Leaders.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1715031/posts


324 posted on 10/08/2006 8:43:37 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative

I remember that now. Thanks! I read the letter Kingston and the other Republicans wrote and loved it. Smart guy and made old Marty look like the jerk he is.


328 posted on 10/08/2006 8:44:10 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative
The Republican was Jack Kingston - I've always liked him. He's the one that initiated and sent the letter to Pelosi re appearing under oath. I'll look for the thread

Kingston stood out positively to me on the day of the 403 to 3 vote last year, as did Gingrey and Johnson (TX).

341 posted on 10/08/2006 8:50:26 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Ma'am, you don't have to thank us. You just go beat him for us." Soldier to Irey re: Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative
The Republican was Jack Kingston - I've always liked him. He's the one that initiated and sent the letter to Pelosi re appearing under oath. I'll look for the thread

Did that topic come up?  I missed his appearance.  In fact, I missed everything but bits and pieces of FNS. 

456 posted on 10/08/2006 9:41:13 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson