Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 8 October 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 8 October 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 10/08/2006 5:15:10 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, October 8th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Reps. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., and Martin Meehan-D-Mass.; conservative radio host Laura Ingraham, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins and Citizens United President David Bossie; retired Maj. Gen. Edward F. Grillo Jr., president of the Air Force Memorial Foundation.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo., and his Democratic opponent, state auditor Claire McCaskill; journalist Bob Woodward.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Reps. Tom Davis, R-Va., and Ray LaHood, R-Ill.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Reps. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., and Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill.; former Secretary of State James Baker; actress Patricia Heaton, spokeswoman for Cure Autism Now.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari; Sens. Joseph Biden, D-Del., and John Cornyn, R-Texas; former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; news; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 921-935 next last
To: Right_in_Virginia

Laura must know that she's lost a good part of her listening audience.


321 posted on 10/08/2006 8:41:10 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

Mel's anti-semitism is behind his anti war rhetoric. If the middle east is pacified it means Israel survives. Gibson can't stand the very thought.


322 posted on 10/08/2006 8:42:32 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dave Olson

thks for catching that bad typo:)


323 posted on 10/08/2006 8:42:56 AM PDT by texicali (those than can do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative; Morgan in Denver

Here's the thread:

House Republicans Wants Democrats to Appear Before Ethics Committee
Human Events ^ | 10-06-2006 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 10/06/2006 11:57:43 AM PDT by 300magnum

Eleven House Republicans on Thursday told Democratic leaders they want them to appear before the House Ethics Committee to answer questions about what they may have known -- and failed to disclose -- about former Rep. Mark Foley's communications with congressional pages.

Led by Rep. Jack Kingston (Ga.), vice chairman of the House Republican Conference, the group sent letters to Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) and Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean. The Republicans say Democrats shouldn't be absolved from answering questions about the scandal, especially in light of suspicions that the crisis was orchestrated as a political move to harm Republicans.

Just as it must be determined whether any Republican Members or political operatives were aware of and attempted to conceal Mr. Foley’s activities, it must also be determined whether any Democrat Members or political operatives were aware of, and attempted to conceal these same activities.

Therefore, we respectfully ask that you appear, under oath, before the House Ethics Committee.

In addition to Kingston, signatories include Representatives Kay Granger (Tex.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), Bill Shuster (Pa.), Lee Terry (Neb.), Tom Price (Ga.), Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Joe Wilson (S.C.), Lynn Westmoreland (Ga.), Roger Wicker (Miss.) and John Shadegg (Ariz.).

In a statement sent to bloggers late Thursday afternoon, Kingston said the following:

This sad episode should not be a partisan issue. It reflects poorly on the Congress as a whole and weakens the trust of the American people. In order to restore that trust we must complete this investigation in a thorough and non-partisan fashion. All Members of the House, our staff, and members of the public regardless of political party should come forward and provide whatever information they know. We need to get to the bottom of who knew about Mr. Foley's inexcusable actions, when did they know about it, when did they first become aware of the Instant Messages in question, and what did they do with that information. As Republicans we expect, and so far have seen, nothing less from our Leaders and today we are asking for the same full cooperation from Democratic Leaders.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1715031/posts


324 posted on 10/08/2006 8:43:37 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: bray
Agreed Fooley is just the DNC's Wag the Fag since they were heading into the tank after BJ's performance.

ROTFLMGO!!!!!!

325 posted on 10/08/2006 8:43:38 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Ma'am, you don't have to thank us. You just go beat him for us." Soldier to Irey re: Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: bray

I don't listen to any radio show during the day as I work...I was only speaking to what she said today


326 posted on 10/08/2006 8:43:57 AM PDT by texicali (those than can do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Dick should've taken him hunting. /s


327 posted on 10/08/2006 8:43:59 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

I remember that now. Thanks! I read the letter Kingston and the other Republicans wrote and loved it. Smart guy and made old Marty look like the jerk he is.


328 posted on 10/08/2006 8:44:10 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Que?


329 posted on 10/08/2006 8:45:16 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

Thanks.


330 posted on 10/08/2006 8:45:30 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Thank you for your report on Laura Ingraham, which I won't see until this evening.

She has spent all week ticking her listeners off by insisting that Hastert resign. If she didn't say that on Fox, then she is backtracking from her statements of last week.

331 posted on 10/08/2006 8:45:57 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

amen to Congressman Kingston...I could not remember his name but thought he did well today


332 posted on 10/08/2006 8:46:27 AM PDT by texicali (those than can do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: texicali

I watched Reliable Sources...it was actually pretty good; topics of Foley and Iraq. Even balance of guests. Questions from the audience....all of which demonstrated the audience full and complete understanding of the media bias. Bill Press was on, and was ridiculous as usual....he was up against Frum, who was darn good. There was some discussion of how this info got out, and Frum made the extremely valid point of CREWs involvement and the release of three year old information 40 days before an election. The audience was much smarter than the panel of journo's, for sure. Roberts was on (Cokie's hubby) and was asked about the medias reporting on this, and is it meant to impact the election. He denied it profusely (he doeth protest too much) and said reporters are reporting it down the middle (falling on the floor laughing about that one). Anyway, I don't know if it reruns, but it was pretty good show all around, imho.


333 posted on 10/08/2006 8:46:30 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: samantha

I'll keep my fingers crossed for Negron. I heard him on Fox and Friends and he did fine.


334 posted on 10/08/2006 8:46:30 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

I can't for the life of me understand how NJ would vote for Menendez (in spite of Kean Jr.). Did Kean stating Hastert should resign bump his numbers up? I hope he's happy./s


335 posted on 10/08/2006 8:47:33 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Woodward keeps saying he has recordings of all his conversations but I've not heard a single recording despite numerous people saying they never made comments in his book.


336 posted on 10/08/2006 8:48:03 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Please... Woodward's the media whore who stated a man in a coma spoke to him. He's a waste of oxygen.


337 posted on 10/08/2006 8:48:40 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative
I think he did sound a bit on the defensive side today (unusual for him)

I thought the same thing SC. Woodward was just plain angry on MTP. Heh. I supposed he's annoyed because Cheney called his book "bullshit".

I would imagine that Woodward isn't all that happy with this Foley furor. Mostly, let's be honest here, America's not paying much attention to Woodward's book. The Dems got so many irons in the fire I really think Americans are tuning them out.

338 posted on 10/08/2006 8:49:04 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

thanks I'll try to catch it out here...sounds like a good one and informative...I think this did have some help from the other side always have


339 posted on 10/08/2006 8:49:31 AM PDT by texicali (those than can do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Ingraham's inbox must have melted down.

Fine with me, it can stay that way.

340 posted on 10/08/2006 8:50:10 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 921-935 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson