Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
You can keep me off your ping list if you're going to take cheap shots like this:

This is a serious allegation which should be dealt with here with more than just screams about drive-by media bias.

Either address me with respect or do not address me at all. I'm not going to let up on your media pals.

Thank you.

24 posted on 10/08/2006 12:05:22 AM PDT by Allegra (Super Elastic Bubble Plastic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Allegra
Done your way, I have no wish to engage anyone who does not want to participate. But for the record, I've committed no "cheap shot." I have merely brought my comments to your attention to respond if you like. There is no reference to you whatsoever in my remarks, I have merely made an observation about a practice on Free Republic to substitute complaints about the media for the substance of the matter. I felt at liberty to ping you because you were not bashful about intervening in my comments about the same topic on this thread: Warner Downbeat After Iraq Trip (U.S. at Risk of Losing Bid to Control Baghdad, Senator Says) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1714729/posts post number 53. I guess I was not aware of the of the etiquette which makes intrusions purely a one-way street.

You were not addressed with disrespect, in fact, you were not addressed at all, merely alerted by way of ping.

Also for the record, you'll note I have pinged a series of of posters who are quite vociferous in stating opinions wholly contrary to mine. I cited them to bring this to their attention so that they would have an opportunity to respond, just as I pinged you. I think it is a matter of intellectual honesty. I do not expect these posters to cringe but to openly express their opinions with a reason and facts. Indeed, I hope, I dearly hope they will prove me wrong.


28 posted on 10/08/2006 12:41:21 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Allegra; nathanbedford
When the statement "The anonymous Pentagon officials (note plural) represent a terrible challenge to anyone who thinks we are on course to "victory" in Iraq." (bold print mine) appears in someone's commentary, you know its conclusions aren't worth much more than the worthless article it discusses. A quote from "an anonymous Pentagon official" is the equivalent of a cow turd. Quotes from several anonymous Pentagon officials is just a bigger pile of turds. "Reporters" who build stories around anonymous statements from anonymous officials aren't worth the pile of crap they create. And neither is the opinion of someone who relies on their BS as evidence of anything other than MSM bias.
29 posted on 10/08/2006 12:41:39 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson