Skip to comments.
Gay Dem Activist Mike Rogers Threatens Daily Outings
BlogActive/Sweetness & Light ^
| October 7, 2006
| N/A
Posted on 10/07/2006 11:42:59 AM PDT by Sam Hill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
10/07/2006 11:42:59 AM PDT
by
Sam Hill
To: Deb; kcvl; Mo1; Enchante; veronica; stocksthatgoup; mewzilla; backhoe; BushisTheMan; Grampa Dave; ..
A "liberal activism at work" ping.
2
posted on
10/07/2006 11:45:13 AM PDT
by
Sam Hill
To: Sam Hill
But if being "gay' is such a wonderful thing, wouldn't he actually be doing these folks a favor by outing them? They should take "pride" in their homosexuality. *cough**choke** SSZ
3
posted on
10/07/2006 11:51:09 AM PDT
by
szweig
To: Sam Hill
A liberal on a witch hunt of gays in Congress
And not one Dem condemns these actions
4
posted on
10/07/2006 11:51:56 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
To: Sam Hill
This creep needs to be Foleyized if he has ever been a homosexual predator or flown to Mexico, Thailand, or ? to have sex with young boys held prisoner for homosexual predators.
Or has he hired or worked with Homosexual Predators and just ignored their crimes against innocent young boys.
How many of his hot tub buddies have bragged about having sex with a minor, and like Vegas, Rogers left that crime confession in their hot tub?
5
posted on
10/07/2006 11:53:51 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
To: Mo1
"And not one Dem condemns these actions"
Of course not. They would have to demonstrate ethics in order to condemn this behavior.
6
posted on
10/07/2006 11:55:21 AM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Father of an American Soldier fighting in the WOT)
To: Mo1
of course not, since he's only going to be outing Republicans, I would guess..
7
posted on
10/07/2006 11:55:35 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
To: Sam Hill
Perfect.
Daily outings, followed promptly by daily cleaning out of desks.
It's a start.
To: Sam Hill
Oh, the hypocrisy of it all.
9
posted on
10/07/2006 11:58:53 AM PDT
by
pipecorp
( Al Lahsucks...Islam: nothing that a good crusade wouldn't fix ;; mercy is wasted on the merciless.)
To: szweig
I believe that's the rationalization -- "Later, he'll thank me."
10
posted on
10/07/2006 11:59:22 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Face it, every empire comes to an end, and ours is on the down hill slope.)
To: Sam Hill
To:Mike Rogers
"I am very concerned what these CLOSETED high level staffers.." Everyone has something hidden in their closet. Even Dimocrat open gays. Right, Mike?
|
|
|
To: Sam Hill; All
Someone is going to get his "list" and deny him the ability to selectively "out" only who he wants to. Then we'll see who on the Dim side will let this nut-case keep running their agenda for them.
12
posted on
10/07/2006 12:00:44 PM PDT
by
Wuli
To: Sam Hill
Let me be the first to out Sen. Lindsay Graham, his partner Ernie, and their adopted child Elmo.
/sarc
13
posted on
10/07/2006 12:01:07 PM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
To: Sam Hill
Is that a picture of him holding something that he had removed from an orifice in an ER somewhere?
14
posted on
10/07/2006 12:01:07 PM PDT
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Yeah, if there is a cadre of staffers in republican office holders' offices, gumming up legislation they don't like, I'm all for getting them out of there. I have been getting a sense that there may be a LOT of homosexual activists inbedded on Capitol Hill.
Oh, and for the record, Page Tail Chasing has become a time honored tradition on the Hill. I agree that the program should be disbanded. It's like Jacko having an amusement park to attract little boys. It's an irresistable attraction for teens that want to get into politics, and then the chickenhawks do nothing but take advantage of them.
15
posted on
10/07/2006 12:03:00 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Face it, every empire comes to an end, and ours is on the down hill slope.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Let me see if I fully understand.
He implies the Republican party is infested with gays.
So he's going to expose them so we can get rid of them.
But, yet, it is the Republican party that is homophobic???
Mr. Spock: "That is not logical, Captain"
16
posted on
10/07/2006 12:04:38 PM PDT
by
gb63
To: Sam Hill
What about the Constitutional "right to privacy"?
17
posted on
10/07/2006 12:05:19 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Sam Hill
These threats of Rogers are, in their effect, a flaming denunciation of homosexuality and the vindictiveness of its adherents. His arguments couldn't win the day in honest debate, so he strikes back at those who stood in his way, not unlike a childish toddler.
18
posted on
10/07/2006 12:09:57 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: Sam Hill
Fine. Out them so we can get rid of them.
19
posted on
10/07/2006 12:10:30 PM PDT
by
Dreagon
To: Sam Hill
GO Mikey, discredit YOUR side and warn OUR side where are problem children are. THEN when you screw up and out someone who is NOT gay, they can sue your scumbag butt out of existence. This is a Win-Win-Win situation
20
posted on
10/07/2006 12:14:52 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Evil Dooer, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson